Re: [dpdk-moving] Reminder on Today's Meeting and Updated Charter

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2016-11-24 12:46, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary@redhat.com]
> > Fourthly, do we need to make a distinction between DPDK the software
> > project and the DPDK Project, the entity which will come into being
> > under the LF? I ask, because participation in the DPDK software project
> > is clearly not to be limited to paying members, while participation in
> > the DPDK Project under the LF is limited to paying companies, for the
> > most part.
> 
> The aim was that this was clear from point 4.a in the Membership section. At last week's meeting somebody (Matt I think) suggested adding a membership category of Contributor to make this clearer, but most people felt this was over-kill.
> 
> Do you think this is clear from point 4.a, or do you still think something further is required?

I think the membership section must be part of the governing board section.
So it makes clear that we are talking about members of the governing board.