From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6D52A07; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:57:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2016 03:57:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,462,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1056793963" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2016 03:57:40 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.210]) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.226]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:57:38 +0000 From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" To: Vincent JARDIN , "moving@dpdk.org" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-moving] Draft Project Charter Thread-Index: AdI5pkYVVUeHBQEwQmOpxJKoL3mb+AADqbkAAABaF8A= Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:57:36 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA6760E5AC@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA6760E51D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <213281a6-6b14-f067-dca0-4b442557b05e@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <213281a6-6b14-f067-dca0-4b442557b05e@6wind.com> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZjNiMjE2YjAtNzlhYy00ODg2LWI4NGItZWQ2YzUyNzY2ZTMxIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IjRzcGUwWDVcL2RoS0w1VkpablBTalV5V2E5U2lYSForXC93d3RGNEtsRTAxYz0ifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] [dpdk-dev] Draft Project Charter X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:57:43 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN > Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:41 AM > To: moving@dpdk.org > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-moving] Draft Project Charter >=20 > Tim, >=20 > Thanks for your draft, but it is not a good proposal. It is not written > in the spirit that we have discussed in Dublin: > - you create the status of "Gold" members that we do not want from > Linux Foundation, As I said in the email, I put in two levels of membership as a placeholder.= The first thing we need to decide is if we want to have a budget and membe= rship, or if we want the OVS model with 0 budget and no membership. We can = discuss that at today's meeting. If we do want a membership model then we'll need to decide if everybody con= tributes at the same rate or if we support multiple levels. So, for now, th= e text on having two levels is just an example to show what a membership mo= del might look like. > - you start with "DPDK's first $1,000,000", it is far from the $O > that we agreed based on OVS model. That's just standard text that I see in all the LF charters. It's even in t= he OVS charter (http://openvswitch.org/charter/charter.pdf) even though the= y have 0 budget. I assumed it's standard text for the LF. I'm sure Mike Dol= an can clarify. >=20 > Please, explain why you did change it? >=20 > Thank you, > Vincent