From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09786943 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:52:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C98883A4; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-41-137.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-168.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.168]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9VIq8Nc008452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:52:08 -0400 To: Michael Dolan , Raghu References: <58177E46.6050007@redhat.com> From: Dave Neary Message-ID: <581792D7.2000704@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:52:07 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "moving@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Reminder: Formerly discussed DPDK budget X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:52:10 -0000 Hi Mike, The budget was created by Laura Kempke back in March (IIRC) - we had 2-3 go-arounds before we arrived at this. I completely agree that the budget will need to be re-worked - as I said, I intended it only to be a reminder of what we had before, and a basis for discussion. Thanks, Dave. On 10/31/2016 01:52 PM, Michael Dolan wrote: > Hi Dave, I'm not sure that budget is still relevant / accurate. When was > that created? > > I thought the group wanted to explore a CI/test infrastructure and 1 > event per year only... did I misunderstand that? I'm copying Raghu from > the LF who will be helping to create budget estimates. I see marketing, > websites, trademark work in here that doesn't seem relevant. I only > asked Raghu to listen in to scope out CI/test infrastructure and an event. > > --- > Mike Dolan > VP of Strategic Programs > The Linux Foundation > Office: +1.330.460.3250 Cell: +1.440.552.5322 Skype: michaelkdolan > mdolan@linuxfoundation.org > --- > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Dave Neary > wrote: > > Hi, > > As a reminder and basis for our current discussions, this is the budget > that the LF came up with during our previous discussions: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256 > > > Thanks, > Dave. > > -- > Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy > Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com > Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 > > > -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338