From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC93A0530 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:34:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6E61F28; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:34:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com (mail-pg1-f194.google.com [209.85.215.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859D31F28 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:34:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 70so821623pgf.8 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:34:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s8hwwL4bl0thIpFVy8M8UHKybvnN8d+WEpRGU712D+E=; b=B7bqg6rGv3Wi06OjGx0x08/4ovD19EZ+bcAtvyx5H7FAETSpWVIhxnwT1M37dmnj9Y I1nE/slk+LV5PZ88RKd5ef7r1hmI2+b0eBXIhyrA6Te/f5l9FUSa3zO3DUNm3H3HFTze QEFn29FbjyTD8EGYr99iHyBEOWNYIJ3sb6RueVnoAqTNsLWkg+Ly7Qqn9Mi2NuZQtNq0 nynFZNs7QBUS4ZpoEGx2BesL8YKs7zhHnMESBbfYIl3M97TdILNp6jryjMZXSyO8CFRA VQj13xPdGnLInA+M46GGsjbItVKNKANNfpwVOv1Z+ZHZFKjoUOKp7mmAFrDV+hwc0FkW ZopA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s8hwwL4bl0thIpFVy8M8UHKybvnN8d+WEpRGU712D+E=; b=MAOpriv/Ici7IZfwF6tZEZivx3Kqn3Pdw10nCfQ2FNJO5B+CiYDdoKB5K/Toai/QWV 1GGUeITTowy87RCv4uY0o0V81RkKLcHatKdBZfbZIJpzqNST/8VmCBVSDPsblruYcOQp x5vTKdRdykfiFXfxxqi5IPPBSX7yMmdelGn3b8IJ7YCkyZr7RwMZ7va9xUpZtINhnnhB H+mnLG1etODTpaXghaKv+x7/OLSex2sVMz95ku1akl76eM73aHWRNPzE9/cxw+e1vQfn I+GZU1ZNXSKVg2Kp4vELmCjkO8KzZVRvPiG45/L6g+qKha0taqKZw892BU3vFubR5rXi C6Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRiwVQL5lp1V0slLF3N1uvU7rqDj+0rOsTaxqkw4s4TwFtIaoy 8TAuXMVDtB3Rs3/FqLYrSO75c7YV X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSYlfZWK0ZIsZF06tM5BKgZrlJ0ExhTvH++dWMa7yw6NhOy7jMhlus0A0mryNN74nRFT2zng== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9562:: with SMTP id x2mr7401338pfq.147.1581496441266; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.30.202.27] ([192.47.164.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm6881302pff.111.2020.02.12.00.33.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:34:00 -0800 (PST) To: Hideyuki Yamashita Cc: x-fn-spp-ml@ntt-tx.co.jp, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, spp@dpdk.org References: <20200210114410.29741-1-x-fn-spp-ml@ntt-tx.co.jp> <20200212151813.C6E7.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> From: Yasufumi Ogawa Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:34:47 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200212151813.C6E7.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [spp] (x-fn-spp-ml 22) Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update rcps and docs for Multiple Node usecase. X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spp-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "spp" On 2020/02/12 15:18, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote: > Hello Yasufumi, > > In short, yes! > > Let me explani a bit more. > 1 I have sent only one patch set. > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/spp/2020-February/thread.html > 2. I have changed the source email address without registering > it with SPP ml, it caused pending status (need intervention by > maintainer) of patch set. > > So from your view point, you will see several patchset are > sent by me. OK. Please make sure your address is registered to the ML before the next time. > I appologize about confusing you. > > Anyway, as I mentioned I sent only one type of patch set, > so please check the one. > > Thanks! > > BR, > Hideyuki Yamashita > NTT TechnoCross > > >> Hi Hideyuki, >> >> It looks you sent same patchsets three times. Is the latest one is v3 and should I ignore the previous two patchsets? >> >> Yasufumi >> >> On 2020/02/10 20:44, x-fn-spp-ml@ntt-tx.co.jp wrote: >>> From: Hideyuki Yamashita >>> >>> There are several incorrectness and missing part on >>> both docs and rcps for multiple node usecase. >>> This patch is for 18.08.4. >>> >>> tx-spp (2): >>> rcps: update recipes for multiple node usecase >>> docs: update command for multiple node usecase >>> >>> docs/guides/usecases/multi_nodes.rst | 2 ++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/10_host3_stop_fwd.rcps | 6 ++++++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/11_host4_stop_fwd.rcps | 6 ++++++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/3_host1_start_fwd.rcps | 7 +++++++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/4_host2_start_fwd.rcps | 8 ++++++++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/5_host3_start_fwd.rcps | 8 ++++++++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/6_host4_start_fwd.rcps | 8 ++++++++ >>> .../usecases/multiple_nodes/7_config_change_path.rcps | 11 +++++++++++ >>> recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/8_host1_stop_fwd.rcps | 6 ++++++ >>> recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/9_host2_stop_fwd.rcps | 6 ++++++ >>> 10 files changed, 68 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/10_host3_stop_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/11_host4_stop_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/3_host1_start_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/4_host2_start_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/5_host3_start_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/6_host4_start_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/7_config_change_path.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/8_host1_stop_fwd.rcps >>> create mode 100644 recipes/usecases/multiple_nodes/9_host2_stop_fwd.rcps >>> > >