From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4094EA0A0A
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  6 May 2021 03:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343AE40040;
	Thu,  6 May 2021 03:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpbgau1.qq.com (smtpbgau1.qq.com [54.206.16.166])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E300140040
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Thu,  6 May 2021 03:43:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp52t1620265387t05u437e
Received: from jiawenwu (unknown [183.129.236.74])
 by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with 
 id ; Thu, 06 May 2021 09:43:06 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 01400000002000D0E000B00A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: PWyfT+jp+Ft9q1XKIMAevTqe3jy1mwhVke9IqR8tHkYtA6lmHN379smWezWUH
 cC52pMO9rt64xx23Vw2YqeKyyG2iL2GgUHfRMDqEi0YKOmYFS0HTrt26U16WN7oLl5P0rZH
 ysmcYc5rcAM9V/d3eVKk5elZF2rSlB+yfhSf7j2sZPY/bzQuKuQqiCEquyKtW2GYPWfODgj
 GwAIunSQFrEluoB5bCMaP7C55jlJ2ZPtT+RWeUywu/RvUzXz8yO857epTDwM1z8rgXItgbY
 eqVMjVtJ8zLG/VHU6A/u2J8R5woo8ekatbBv5/Qwgxp3ONEHZLI1boXctF+uK3dd9qj6zoC
 CoWCdzs
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
From: "Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
To: "'Ferruh Yigit'" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	<dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <stable@dpdk.org>
References: <20210429103335.23060-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
 <20210429103335.23060-3-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
 <2930eba7-611c-2a18-f5f3-525c2a259048@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <2930eba7-611c-2a18-f5f3-525c2a259048@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 09:43:05 +0800
Message-ID: <001e01d74219$29864540$7c92cfc0$@trustnetic.com>+91299C9BBBDE942D
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: zh-cn
Thread-Index: AQJHgyLWsk1k8Vlpl8OBLLWX+ze9ZQI5nSmMAkrQlTSp0QTPoA==
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:trustnetic.com:qybgforeign:qybgforeign6
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/txgbe: fix VF MTU limit setting
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>

On April 29, 2021 11:00 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/29/2021 11:33 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > Add the dev_started check to remove the limitation of VF MTU =
setting.
> > When device is stopped, it is allowed to set MTU bigger than mbuf =
size.
> > Scattered rx may be enabled in next starting, exempt from setting in
> > EAL parameters.
> >
>=20
> I have reworded the commit log, can you please check in next-net if it =
is alright.
>=20
> > Fixes: a2beaa4a769e ("net/txgbe: support VF MTU update")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
>=20
> <...>

That's OK.
Thanks Ferruh.