From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: "Xu, HailinX" <hailinx.xu@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
shperetz@nvidia.com
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: 24.11.2 patches review and test
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:24:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <029acdda-4147-4b55-bf10-7d6ef8b92d2f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB5924B25AAEBE0D441AC306779FB82@SA1PR11MB5924.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 21/04/2025 07:18, Xu, HailinX wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 6:15 PM
>> To: stable@dpdk.org
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
>> Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; David Christensen
>> <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
>> Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>;
>> Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
>> <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca
>> Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>; Raslan
>> Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
>> <thomas@monjalon.net>; yanghliu@redhat.com
>> Subject: 24.11.2 patches review and test
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 24.11.2.
>>
>> The planned date for the final release is 14 April.
>>
>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any
>> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and
>> reported validations will be added to the release notes.
>>
>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
>>
>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v24.11.2-rc1
>>
>> These patches are located at branch 24.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> ---
Hi Hailin,
Thanks for the testing and report. Comments below.
> Update the test status for Intel part. dpdk24.11.2-rc1 all validation test done. no new issue is found.
>
> known issues: fix patch has been merged into main, but they not merged 24.11 LTS, so this issue still exists in 24.11.2-rc1
> 1. Bug 1606 - flow_filtering/flow_filtering_mismatch_rule: Some mismatch rule packets match the rule.
> - has fix patch: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20250112075200.5020-1-shperetz@nvidia.com/
(CC: Shani)
This patch is part of 24.11.2-rc2, so not sure if it's the same issue
you are seeing ?
It is applied here
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=b540e51a864d25b1e254fa8c311b92223e0f4162
$ git tag --contains b540e51a8
v24.11.2-rc1
$ git show b540e51a8
commit b540e51a864d25b1e254fa8c311b92223e0f4162
Author: Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun Jan 12 09:52:00 2025 +0200
examples/flow_filtering: fix IPv4 matching snippet
[ upstream commit 5fa25916f1ab47c82310264449a6d67dbb15ca4d ]
This patch corrects the destination IP address mask to
restore the previous implementation's behavior.
Also it fixes a misuse of rte_flow_item_tcp struct.
Replace it with the appropriate rte_flow_item_ipv4 struct,
as the code in this context filters ipv4 traffic.
Fixes: 16158f349000 ("examples/flow_filtering: introduce use cases
snippets")
Signed-off-by: Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>
> 2. Linkville vfs can't forward packets
> - has fix patches: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=34939&archive=both&state=*
>
This issue was introduced by missing case in commit '316637762a5f
("net/ixgbe/base: enable E610 device")' from 24.07. The patches linked
are already applied in main branch and patch 2/3 has the fix.
In summary, the first reported issue is example code. The second issue
is not a regression from 24.11.1 but I'll apply the fix patch for that
as it's straightforward.
I will go ahead with the release as it is overdue. It would be nice if
we can resolve the first issue for 24.11.3 but we have time.
thanks,
Kevin
> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test with latest GCC/Clang version on the following OS(all passed)
> - Ubuntu24.10/Ubuntu24.04.1
> - RHEL9.4/RHEL9.5/RHEL10 beta
> - Fedora41
> - FreeBSD14.2
> - SUSE15.6
> - OpenAnolis8.9
> - AzureLinux3.0
>
> * Function tests: All test done and there are two known issues.
> - i40E-(XXV710, X722) PF/VF: test scenarios including basic/RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/mac_filter/VLAN/VXLAN/RSS, etc.
> - IXGBE-(82599, E610) PF/VF: test scenarios including basic/RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/mac_filter/VLAN/VXLAN/RSS, etc.
> - ICE-(E810, E830, E2100) PF/VF: test scenarios including basic/Switch/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
> - IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> - Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
> - Cryptodev: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
> - DLB: test scenarios including DLB2.0 and DLB2.5
> - Other: test scenarios including AF_XDP, Power, CBDMA, DSA
>
> * Performance test: All test done and passed
> - Thoughput Performance
> - Cryptodev Latency
> - PF/VF NIC single core
> - XXV710/E810 NIC Performance
>
>
> Regards,
> Xu, Hailin
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 10:14 Kevin Traynor
2025-04-01 8:05 ` Yanghang Liu
2025-04-11 13:43 ` Kevin Traynor
2025-04-10 14:40 ` Ali Alnubani
2025-04-11 13:45 ` Kevin Traynor
2025-04-11 13:50 ` Kevin Traynor
2025-04-21 6:18 ` Xu, HailinX
2025-04-23 10:24 ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=029acdda-4147-4b55-bf10-7d6ef8b92d2f@redhat.com \
--to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hailinx.xu@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=shperetz@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).