patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"Wang, ShougangX" <shougangx.wang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
	"Wang, ShougangX" <shougangx.wang@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix incorrect hash look up table
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:53:23 +0000
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061154864F86@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB0017E2387CBB71123F8F74DFE5760@BN6PR11MB0017.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Yang, Qiming
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 9:57 AM
> To: Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.wang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang,
> ShougangX <shougangx.wang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix incorrect hash look up table
> 
> I don't understand why you add new function and new function mostly do the
> same thing.
> Why don't add fix in original code.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Shougang Wang
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 16:16
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia
> > <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.wang@intel.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix incorrect hash look up
> > table
> >
> > The hash look up table (LUT) is managed by global register but it is
> > not initialized when RSS is disabled. Once user wants to enable RSS
> > during runtime, the LUT will not be initialized.
> > This patch fixes the issue by initializing the LUT whether RSS enabled or not.
> >
> > Fixes: feaae285b342 ("net/i40e: support hash configuration in RSS
> > flow")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shougang Wang <shougangx.wang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > -Updated the time of initializing the look up table
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 85
> > ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 05d5f2861..e35590d96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -8984,42 +8984,7 @@ i40e_pf_calc_configured_queues_num(struct
> > i40e_pf *pf)  static int  i40e_pf_config_rss(struct i40e_pf *pf)  {
> > -	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> >  	struct rte_eth_rss_conf rss_conf;
> > -	uint32_t i, lut = 0;
> > -	uint16_t j, num;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If both VMDQ and RSS enabled, not all of PF queues are
> > configured.
> > -	 * It's necessary to calculate the actual PF queues that are configured.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (pf->dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode &
> > ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_FLAG)
> > -		num = i40e_pf_calc_configured_queues_num(pf);
> > -	else
> > -		num = pf->dev_data->nb_rx_queues;
> > -
> > -	num = RTE_MIN(num, I40E_MAX_Q_PER_TC);
> > -	PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "Max of contiguous %u PF queues are
> > configured",
> > -			num);
> > -
> > -	if (num == 0) {
> > -		PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> > -			"No PF queues are configured to enable RSS for port
> > %u",
> > -			pf->dev_data->port_id);
> > -		return -ENOTSUP;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (pf->adapter->rss_reta_updated == 0) {
> > -		for (i = 0, j = 0; i < hw->func_caps.rss_table_size; i++, j++) {
> > -			if (j == num)
> > -				j = 0;
> > -			lut = (lut << 8) | (j & ((0x1 <<
> > -				hw->func_caps.rss_table_entry_width) - 1));
> > -			if ((i & 3) == 3)
> > -				I40E_WRITE_REG(hw, I40E_PFQF_HLUT(i >>
> > 2),
> > -					       rte_bswap32(lut));
> > -		}
> > -	}
> >
> >  	rss_conf = pf->dev_data->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf;
> >  	if ((rss_conf.rss_hf & pf->adapter->flow_types_mask) == 0) { @@ -
> > 9195,12 +9160,60 @@ i40e_tunnel_filter_handle(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Initialize the hash look up table */ static int
> > +i40e_pf_init_rss_lut(struct i40e_pf *pf) {
> > +	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > +	uint32_t lut = 0;
> > +	uint16_t j, num;
> > +	uint32_t i;
> > +
> > +	/* If both VMDQ and RSS enabled, not all of PF queues are
> > configured.
> > +	 * It's necessary to calculate the actual PF queues that are configured.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (pf->dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode &
> > ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_FLAG)
> > +		num = i40e_pf_calc_configured_queues_num(pf);
> > +	else
> > +		num = pf->dev_data->nb_rx_queues;
> > +
> > +	num = RTE_MIN(num, I40E_MAX_Q_PER_TC);
> > +	PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "Max of contiguous %u PF queues are
> > configured",
> > +		     num);
> > +
> > +	if (num == 0) {
> > +		PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> > +			"No PF queues are configured to enable RSS for port
> > %u",
> > +			pf->dev_data->port_id);
> > +		return -ENOTSUP;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (pf->adapter->rss_reta_updated == 0) {
> > +		for (i = 0, j = 0; i < hw->func_caps.rss_table_size; i++, j++) {
> > +			if (j == num)
> > +				j = 0;
> > +			lut = (lut << 8) | (j & ((0x1 <<
> > +				hw->func_caps.rss_table_entry_width) - 1));
> > +			if ((i & 3) == 3)
> > +				I40E_WRITE_REG(hw, I40E_PFQF_HLUT(i >>
> > 2),
> > +					       rte_bswap32(lut));
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int
> >  i40e_pf_config_mq_rx(struct i40e_pf *pf)  {
> > -	int ret = 0;
> > +	int ret;
> >  	enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode mq_mode = pf->dev_data-
> > >dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode;
> >
> > +	/* Initialize hash look up table */
> > +	ret = i40e_pf_init_rss_lut(pf);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> >  	/* RSS setup */
> >  	if (mq_mode & ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG)

I agree with Qiming, if we move this check into i40e_pf_config_rss, dose that looks we don't need to create a new function?

> >  		ret = i40e_pf_config_rss(pf);
> > --
> > 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15  6:35 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-15  9:07 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Chen, BoX C
2020-07-18  4:07   ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-21  5:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-21  6:41   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Xie, WeiX
2020-07-22  5:50     ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-22  6:39       ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-22  5:31   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-07-22  6:20     ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-22  8:15 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-23  1:57   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Yang, Qiming
2020-07-23 12:53     ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2020-07-24  2:34       ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-24  2:47 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-24  3:57   ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-24  4:49     ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-24  5:07   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Yang, Qiming
2020-07-24  5:42     ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-24  8:12 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-24  9:00   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Xie, WeiX
2020-07-24  9:38 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-24  9:54   ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-24  9:58     ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061154864F86@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=shougangx.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

patches for DPDK stable branches

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \
		stable@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index stable

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git