From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Yangchao Zhou <zhouyates@gmail.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kni: fix possible alloc_q starvation when mbufs are exhausted
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:47:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <042de5cd-c410-7925-efe9-bea547fec736@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221230042338.1670768-1-zhouyates@gmail.com>
On 12/30/2022 4:23 AM, Yangchao Zhou wrote:
> In some scenarios, mbufs returned by rte_kni_rx_burst are not freed
> immediately. So kni_allocate_mbufs may be failed, but we don't know.
>
> Even worse, when alloc_q is completely exhausted, kni_net_tx in
> rte_kni.ko will drop all tx packets. kni_allocate_mbufs is never
> called again, even if the mbufs are eventually freed.
>
> In this patch, we try to allocate mbufs for alloc_q when it is empty.
>
> According to historical experience, the performance bottleneck of KNI
> is offen the usleep_range of kni thread in rte_kni.ko.
> The check of kni_fifo_count is trivial and the cost should be acceptable.
>
Hi Yangchao,
Are you observing any performance impact with this change in you use case?
> Fixes: 3e12a98fe397 ("kni: optimize Rx burst")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou <zhouyates@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/kni/rte_kni.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> index 8ab6c47153..bfa6a001ff 100644
> --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> @@ -634,8 +634,8 @@ rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int num)
> {
> unsigned int ret = kni_fifo_get(kni->tx_q, (void **)mbufs, num);
>
> - /* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
> - if (ret)
> + /* If buffers removed or alloc_q is empty, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
> + if (ret || (kni_fifo_count(kni->alloc_q) == 0))
> kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
>
> return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-03 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 5:13 [PATCH] " Yangchao Zhou
2022-11-09 6:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Yangchao Zhou
2022-11-09 16:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-11 9:12 ` Matt
2022-12-09 16:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-30 4:23 ` [PATCH v3] " Yangchao Zhou
2023-01-03 12:47 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-01-04 11:57 ` Matt
2023-01-04 14:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-11 9:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=042de5cd-c410-7925-efe9-bea547fec736@amd.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=zhouyates@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).