From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com (mail-wr1-f66.google.com
 [209.85.221.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867487D05
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Thu,  1 Nov 2018 12:25:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r10-v6so19728684wrv.6
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
 :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=+oFvU7HW5afblLImONlPvkjaYsIKkVgPfXwI1mMT1o8=;
 b=nNFnnghbazEMUiv6MkWR6aCVRL9Em4cOS0UieUmNx4pDSKZK/9Hq0ZkVzdTOdRyFCg
 nzvyXWoPkSlZL5jaNBiTwMhoe+gNcsCGYIyk2SCSyyfL3AaMn1hChKsuRU20oP85ufjo
 PsUzwwTQCflYapdJP6ax2HX/g347d6jTitKX/k8r1hgoJI/htdJZTESCXXspdiPyo+ix
 0/X3Y5owxayxf4I4DzE+It48nf0ePRGpNmuJ3KJFLrKoqHOjnUAJDlV9fAox0T8+L9OU
 F7xB06ROsYNdxH8Gsb8pMFuUMDk6jUndOnacGW/t4elzoOE6MXY44+DC6goqbz24jFA3
 L2UA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLO3MJVuG07wXQtRCfB/bRG2PQK4yjYNvQZuIR4rfHpZYZeD1lP
 a4RpUwmDV98QjZh4OZFhO4U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cWT+BnINl9Y8rNocFj23q1FkdsG73eZazgeUj+C8KTqgMskK8Auwh6s8fZ1cyxFJbIJ/bePA==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9563:: with SMTP id 90-v6mr6440702wrs.60.1541071537057; 
 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:1be0:110d:fcfe:70c5:32f6:c5b6:39e6])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 123-v6sm7360210wmw.14.2018.11.01.04.25.35
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1541071534.4849.1.camel@debian.org>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: yoursunny <sunnylandh@gmail.com>
Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 11:25:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CANsAqf6vEcHexqAsWvJ7EcMO_sUcivu07E-FoGnRJQ+fQ5j=SA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181018083737.16783-1-bluca@debian.org>
 <20181101111121.5570-1-bluca@debian.org>
 <CANsAqf6vEcHexqAsWvJ7EcMO_sUcivu07E-FoGnRJQ+fQ5j=SA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] please help backporting some patches to LTS
 release 16.11.9
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 11:25:37 -0000

On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 07:21 -0400, yoursunny wrote:
> Hi Luca
>=20
> I didn't manage to apply following commits from upstream to stable
> branch
> > 16.11: conflict happens. I'm wondering can the authors check the
> > following
> > list and backport those patches belong to you?
> >=20
> > FYI, branch 16.11 is located at tree:
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable
> >=20
> > f49d7e9a9=C2=A0=C2=A0Junxiao Shi=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0cry=
ptodev: fix pool element size for
> > undefined
> > operation
>=20
>=20
> My commit is irrelevant to DPDK 16.11. I=E2=80=99m fixing a small bug
> introduced
> after DPDK gains asymmetric crypto feature. Back then DPDK does not
> support
> assymetric crypto.
>=20
> > Yours, Junxiao

Hi,

Ok, false positive in the selection script, thanks for checking.

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi