From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D84EA0564 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:34:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3228D1BFD6; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:34:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from git-send-mailer.rdmz.labs.mlnx (unknown [37.142.13.130]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8851F1C for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:34:06 +0100 (CET) From: Suanming Mou To: luca.boccassi@gmail.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:33:50 +0800 Message-Id: <1582860835-282594-7-git-send-email-suanmingm@mellanox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1582860835-282594-1-git-send-email-suanmingm@mellanox.com> References: <1582860835-282594-1-git-send-email-suanmingm@mellanox.com> Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 19.11 06/11] net/mlx5: fix layer validation with decapsulation X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" [ upstream commit e505ac7f91b59e1165c143f14b208885658d2f94 ] Currently, the flow validate function only validate the outermost layer with the header modify actions. If there is decapsulation action before the header modify action, the validation should choose the inner layer for validation. Add decapsulation check when validate with the header modify actions. Choose the inner layer once there is decapsulation action. Fixes: 4bb14c83df95 ("net/mlx5: support modify header using Direct Verbs") Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou Acked-by: Matan Azrad --- drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c index f8933b8..3362873 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c @@ -2965,10 +2965,14 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { struct rte_flow_error *error) { int ret = 0; + uint64_t layer; ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error); if (!ret) { - if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L3_IPV4)) + layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ? + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3_IPV4 : + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV4; + if (!(item_flags & layer)) return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL, @@ -2999,10 +3003,14 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { struct rte_flow_error *error) { int ret = 0; + uint64_t layer; ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error); if (!ret) { - if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L3_IPV6)) + layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ? + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3_IPV6 : + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV6; + if (!(item_flags & layer)) return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL, @@ -3033,10 +3041,14 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { struct rte_flow_error *error) { int ret = 0; + uint64_t layer; ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error); if (!ret) { - if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L4)) + layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ? + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4 : + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4; + if (!(item_flags & layer)) return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL, "no transport layer " @@ -3068,10 +3080,14 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { struct rte_flow_error *error) { int ret = 0; + uint64_t layer; ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error); if (!ret) { - if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP)) + layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ? + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4_TCP : + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP; + if (!(item_flags & layer)) return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL, "no TCP item in" @@ -3113,10 +3129,14 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { struct rte_flow_error *error) { int ret = 0; + uint64_t layer; ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error); if (!ret) { - if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP)) + layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ? + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4_TCP : + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP; + if (!(item_flags & layer)) return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL, "no TCP item in" @@ -3157,10 +3177,14 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { struct rte_flow_error *error) { int ret = 0; + uint64_t layer; ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error); if (!ret) { - if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L3)) + layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ? + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3 : + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3; + if (!(item_flags & layer)) return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL, -- 1.8.3.1