From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95BDA05D3
for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:00:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7D54C96;
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:00:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EF43256;
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:00:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CEE21B5A;
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:00:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
bh=wUcfLPCgtu5XUF+yqzl+mTUkH9ncg1IqLADzcsYlkf8=; b=GJu74L9sPc49
yj4F2UDV5saQ1Wn7rGVtUUSf6A5HN9SqGrFdrsgdMaij68W621xkQYieP1HPpyfn
fwuuuPCB3I58/bpxX5bl5UpyUK7BAR41SbSkrC1cadl/HzxgH9NrhwFdRmwG1uqQ
3GIhi76/eEzerdZ6DyiY/V9VacsCnmE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wUcfLPCgtu5XUF+yqzl+mTUkH9ncg1IqLADzcsYlk
f8=; b=0os/QF1qy4zQUyU69UD6iasoIxg33gad7dg7orBh+4I3d2IQKuAu8YR87
5hm0QjclNrfm9PwuPH6bp/HklCeoq1g847X+5/ItHgfDJdnZnVfOaxYgqQm+v7ob
K/Um1q39t9KdSQ+O3yLs5ZXVFlfpZGGnRGRYcm4djvXgmYdF45rg9kgQWFoB7WrB
GONawJzMFXtyAlS/qUj2pH1uaBH2rjsloJMYjyjmJ+hmO+SipRFQD/1v7u5Yq+OI
HJQwf2vHDOmgU2VlYKiXi7f99UAXd6K5/Q6C3NYEvXebwhrMsijhswjOWEIhDa6+
aBWTBmR7gVJH430MDzFL9lLW+5OwQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ACWeXE84RllisSCiyWFXAcjiN__bF1JIhkNolNdSIqta_pvLAVJ14Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrkeejgdefvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs
ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph
epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho
mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepud
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ACWeXM2saMSSlIfr6OFPQIC09me4ejVP08ptYOLa3MZ5RsX1uhl2CQ>
<xmx:ACWeXKTOcAs9FVQ0Ny-wuL6o84Ts-mf-XHxWf_acU2yvemTZII7opw>
<xmx:ACWeXIjrQHMw17NIdeMeokyPCEhoWGmNw8SA1Wyw7wYJwicXDF5cQw>
<xmx:ASWeXC76NaS7vzG2SHbS9gF9mR3JaNouwT-YVJA2fthWWUmg-hBGcQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BCCC1E46C1;
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:00:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, david.hunt@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:00:28 +0100
Message-ID: <1664932.jd42B5FcvL@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20190206121906.4231-1-ktraynor@redhat.com>
References: <20190206121906.4231-1-ktraynor@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] power: fix frequency list buffer
validation
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
<mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
<mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
06/02/2019 13:19, Kevin Traynor:
> The frequency list buffer was already validated in
> power_acpi_cpufreq_freqs(), so the newly added check was redundant.
> To keep consistency with power_pstate_cpufreq_freqs(), remove the
> original check and update the log message.
>
> Fixes: 2e6ccdb4e088 ("power: fix frequency list to handle null buffer")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
In absence of review, applied, thanks.