From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Received: from mellanox.co.il (mail-il-dmz.mellanox.com [193.47.165.129])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9A41B517
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:14:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MTLPINE1 (envelope-from
 yskoh@mellanox.com)
 with ESMTPS (AES256-SHA encrypted); 30 Nov 2018 01:20:46 +0200
Received: from scfae-sc-2.mti.labs.mlnx (scfae-sc-2.mti.labs.mlnx
 [10.101.0.96])
 by labmailer.mlnx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wATNCW8M032075;
 Fri, 30 Nov 2018 01:14:51 +0200
From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: Li Han <han.li1@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:11:16 -0800
Message-Id: <20181129231202.30436-82-yskoh@mellanox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0
In-Reply-To: <20181129231202.30436-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
References: <20181129231202.30436-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'ip_frag: fix overflow in key comparison' has
	been queued to LTS release 17.11.5
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:14:56 -0000

Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to LTS release 17.11.5

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 12/01/18. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied
to the branch. If the code is different (ie: not only metadata diffs), due for example to
a change in context or macro names, please double check it.

Thanks.

Yongseok

---
>>From 2a4584dd9495b6213312930b29f6d2996771a8ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Han <han.li1@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:01:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ip_frag: fix overflow in key comparison

[ upstream commit 8721e07478c6edc9565645047742f79c654cfd1b ]

in struct ip_frag_key,src_dst[] type is uint64_t.
but "val" which to store the calc restult ,type is uint32_t.
we may lost high 32 bit key. and function return value is int,
but it won't return < 0.

Signed-off-by: Li Han <han.li1@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
index 9f5619651..472185f6b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
@@ -98,10 +98,11 @@ ip_frag_key_invalidate(struct ip_frag_key * key)
 }
 
 /* compare two keys */
-static inline int
+static inline uint64_t
 ip_frag_key_cmp(const struct ip_frag_key * k1, const struct ip_frag_key * k2)
 {
-	uint32_t i, val;
+	uint32_t i;
+	uint64_t val;
 	val = k1->id ^ k2->id;
 	for (i = 0; i < k1->key_len; i++)
 		val |= k1->src_dst[i] ^ k2->src_dst[i];
-- 
2.11.0

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2018-11-29 15:01:48.843449420 -0800
+++ 0082-ip_frag-fix-overflow-in-key-comparison.patch	2018-11-29 15:01:45.226961000 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
-From 8721e07478c6edc9565645047742f79c654cfd1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 2a4584dd9495b6213312930b29f6d2996771a8ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Li Han <han.li1@zte.com.cn>
 Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:01:03 -0400
 Subject: [PATCH] ip_frag: fix overflow in key comparison
 
+[ upstream commit 8721e07478c6edc9565645047742f79c654cfd1b ]
+
 in struct ip_frag_key,src_dst[] type is uint64_t.
 but "val" which to store the calc restult ,type is uint32_t.
 we may lost high 32 bit key. and function return value is int,
@@ -15,10 +17,10 @@
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
-index 0fdcc7d0f..0f62e2e16 100644
+index 9f5619651..472185f6b 100644
 --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
 +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
-@@ -75,10 +75,11 @@ ip_frag_key_invalidate(struct ip_frag_key * key)
+@@ -98,10 +98,11 @@ ip_frag_key_invalidate(struct ip_frag_key * key)
  }
  
  /* compare two keys */