From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Received: from mellanox.co.il (mail-il-dmz.mellanox.com [193.47.165.129])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82C1B517
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:15:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MTLPINE1 (envelope-from
 yskoh@mellanox.com)
 with ESMTPS (AES256-SHA encrypted); 30 Nov 2018 01:21:11 +0200
Received: from scfae-sc-2.mti.labs.mlnx (scfae-sc-2.mti.labs.mlnx
 [10.101.0.96])
 by labmailer.mlnx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wATNCW8b032075;
 Fri, 30 Nov 2018 01:15:16 +0200
From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
 Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:11:31 -0800
Message-Id: <20181129231202.30436-97-yskoh@mellanox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0
In-Reply-To: <20181129231202.30436-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
References: <20181129231202.30436-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'test/hash: fix build' has been queued to LTS
	release 17.11.5
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:15:21 -0000

Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to LTS release 17.11.5

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 12/01/18. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied
to the branch. If the code is different (ie: not only metadata diffs), due for example to
a change in context or macro names, please double check it.

Thanks.

Yongseok

---
>>From f4e02a9fa7eb230e4314bf7b05f9f56a4bf725fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:43:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] test/hash: fix build
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

[ upstream commit 57ed574e263444928b793fff0d287121112fba84 ]

Enable print_key_info() function compilation always.

Compilation error message:
'test_hash.c: In function ‘print_key_info’:
test_hash.c:90:15: error: cast discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer
target type [-Werror=cast-qual]
  uint8_t *p = (uint8_t *)key;
               ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors'

Fixes: af75078fece36 ("first public release")

Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
---
 test/test/test_hash.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/test/test_hash.c b/test/test/test_hash.c
index 4668cf1a2..2218142a2 100644
--- a/test/test/test_hash.c
+++ b/test/test/test_hash.c
@@ -109,29 +109,23 @@ static uint32_t pseudo_hash(__attribute__((unused)) const void *keys,
 	return 3;
 }
 
+#define UNIT_TEST_HASH_VERBOSE	0
 /*
  * Print out result of unit test hash operation.
  */
-#if defined(UNIT_TEST_HASH_VERBOSE)
 static void print_key_info(const char *msg, const struct flow_key *key,
 								int32_t pos)
 {
-	uint8_t *p = (uint8_t *)key;
-	unsigned i;
-
-	printf("%s key:0x", msg);
-	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct flow_key); i++) {
-		printf("%02X", p[i]);
+	if (UNIT_TEST_HASH_VERBOSE) {
+		const uint8_t *p = (const uint8_t *)key;
+		unsigned int i;
+
+		printf("%s key:0x", msg);
+		for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct flow_key); i++)
+			printf("%02X", p[i]);
+		printf(" @ pos %d\n", pos);
 	}
-	printf(" @ pos %d\n", pos);
-}
-#else
-static void print_key_info(__attribute__((unused)) const char *msg,
-		__attribute__((unused)) const struct flow_key *key,
-		__attribute__((unused)) int32_t pos)
-{
 }
-#endif
 
 /* Keys used by unit test functions */
 static struct flow_key keys[5] = { {
-- 
2.11.0

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2018-11-29 15:01:49.471133847 -0800
+++ 0097-test-hash-fix-build.patch	2018-11-29 15:01:45.256958000 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From 57ed574e263444928b793fff0d287121112fba84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From f4e02a9fa7eb230e4314bf7b05f9f56a4bf725fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:43:03 -0500
 Subject: [PATCH] test/hash: fix build
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 
+[ upstream commit 57ed574e263444928b793fff0d287121112fba84 ]
+
 Enable print_key_info() function compilation always.
 
 Compilation error message:
@@ -17,7 +19,6 @@
 cc1: all warnings being treated as errors'
 
 Fixes: af75078fece36 ("first public release")
-Cc: stable@dpdk.org
 
 Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
 Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
@@ -28,10 +29,10 @@
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/test/test/test_hash.c b/test/test/test_hash.c
-index 6d06eb24c..fe607fadf 100644
+index 4668cf1a2..2218142a2 100644
 --- a/test/test/test_hash.c
 +++ b/test/test/test_hash.c
-@@ -80,29 +80,23 @@ static uint32_t pseudo_hash(__attribute__((unused)) const void *keys,
+@@ -109,29 +109,23 @@ static uint32_t pseudo_hash(__attribute__((unused)) const void *keys,
  	return 3;
  }