From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70FB1B49F for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 14:28:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2266EC059B8D; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ktraynor.remote.csb (ovpn-117-13.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E8B5C1A1; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Traynor To: Rami Rosen Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dpdk stable Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:24:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20190104132455.15170-69-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190104132455.15170-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> References: <20190104132455.15170-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'net/avf/base: fix comment referencing internal data' has been queued to LTS release 18.11.1 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:28:41 -0000 Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to LTS release 18.11.1 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 01/11/19. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Thanks. Kevin Traynor --- >>From 219accaa41c485aa08a30def6da87d31ed007b0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rami Rosen Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:16:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net/avf/base: fix comment referencing internal data [ upstream commit 97cb8042ad808ee48b94c3729258a4097e042e29 ] DCR is Intel internal information, no need to be in public code. Related commit: 1a0833efde70 ("net/i40e/base: fix comment referencing internal data") Fixes: e5b2a9e957e7 ("net/avf/base: add base code for avf PMD") Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit --- drivers/net/avf/base/avf_adminq_cmd.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/avf/base/avf_adminq_cmd.h b/drivers/net/avf/base/avf_adminq_cmd.h index 1709f317e..795491187 100644 --- a/drivers/net/avf/base/avf_adminq_cmd.h +++ b/drivers/net/avf/base/avf_adminq_cmd.h @@ -1436,6 +1436,5 @@ struct avf_aqc_add_remove_cloud_filters_element_data { /* avf_aqc_add_rm_cloud_filt_elem_ext is used when - * AVF_AQC_ADD_REM_CLOUD_CMD_BIG_BUFFER flag is set. refer to - * DCR288 + * AVF_AQC_ADD_REM_CLOUD_CMD_BIG_BUFFER flag is set. */ struct avf_aqc_add_rm_cloud_filt_elem_ext { -- 2.19.0 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2019-01-04 13:23:09.123128912 +0000 +++ 0069-net-avf-base-fix-comment-referencing-internal-data.patch 2019-01-04 13:23:07.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@ -From 97cb8042ad808ee48b94c3729258a4097e042e29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 219accaa41c485aa08a30def6da87d31ed007b0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rami Rosen Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:16:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net/avf/base: fix comment referencing internal data +[ upstream commit 97cb8042ad808ee48b94c3729258a4097e042e29 ] + DCR is Intel internal information, no need to be in public code. Related commit: 1a0833efde70 ("net/i40e/base: fix comment referencing internal data") Fixes: e5b2a9e957e7 ("net/avf/base: add base code for avf PMD") -Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit