From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id D255DA05D3
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:42:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFE97D52;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:42:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7058A7D52;
 Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 26 Apr 2019 01:42:12 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,396,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="165046958"
Received: from silpixa00399952.ir.intel.com (HELO
 silpixa00399952.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.64])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2019 01:42:11 -0700
From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: david.hunt@intel.com,
	stable@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:42:09 +0100
Message-Id: <20190426084209.3853-1-david.hunt@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1
In-Reply-To: <20190423085344.3493-1-david.hunt@intel.com>
References: <20190423085344.3493-1-david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] examples/vm_power_manager: fix buffer
	overrun
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>

The freqs array in freq_info struct has RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS elements,
yet the code can attempt to look at the index at  RTE_MAX_LCORE,
which may be greater than RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS. Fix to limit index to
RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS.

Fixes: d26c18c93260 ("examples/vm_power: cpu frequency in host")
Coverity issue: 337660
CC: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Acked-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>

---
v2 - Rebase to 19.05 RC2.
v3 - add CC stable
---
 examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c b/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c
index 9553455be..9d4e587b0 100644
--- a/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c
+++ b/examples/vm_power_manager/power_manager.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ power_manager_get_current_frequency(unsigned core_num)
 	rte_spinlock_lock(&global_core_freq_info[core_num].power_sl);
 	index = rte_power_get_freq(core_num);
 	rte_spinlock_unlock(&global_core_freq_info[core_num].power_sl);
-	if (index >= RTE_MAX_LCORE)
+	if (index >= RTE_MAX_LCORE_FREQS)
 		freq = 0;
 	else
 		freq = global_core_freq_info[core_num].freqs[index];
-- 
2.17.1