From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: ktraynor@redhat.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, shahafs@mellanox.com
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 18.11] net/mlx5: fix instruction hotspot on replenishing Rx buffer
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:22:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430202227.36167-1-yskoh@mellanox.com> (raw)
On replenishing Rx buffers for vectorized Rx, mbuf->buf_addr isn't needed
to be accessed as it is static and easily calculated from the mbuf address.
Accessing the mbuf content causes unnecessary load stall. non-x86
processors (mostly RISC such as ARM and Power) are more vulnerable to load
stall. For x86, reducing the number of instructions seems to matter most.
Fixes: 545b884b1da3 ("net/mlx5: fix buffer address posting in SSE Rx")
Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h
index fda7004e2..86735044d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h
@@ -102,7 +102,22 @@ mlx5_rx_replenish_bulk_mbuf(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq, uint16_t n)
return;
}
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
- wq[i].addr = rte_cpu_to_be_64((uintptr_t)elts[i]->buf_addr +
+ void *buf_addr;
+
+ /*
+ * Load the virtual address for Rx WQE. non-x86 processors
+ * (mostly RISC such as ARM and Power) are more vulnerable to
+ * load stall. For x86, reducing the number of instructions
+ * seems to matter most.
+ */
+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
+ buf_addr = elts[i]->buf_addr;
+#else
+ buf_addr = (char *)elts[i] + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) +
+ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(rxq->mp);
+ assert(buf_addr == elts[i]->buf_addr);
+#endif
+ wq[i].addr = rte_cpu_to_be_64((uintptr_t)buf_addr +
RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
/* If there's only one MR, no need to replace LKey in WQE. */
if (unlikely(mlx5_mr_btree_len(&rxq->mr_ctrl.cache_bh) > 1))
--
2.11.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 20:22 Yongseok Koh [this message]
2019-05-01 9:42 ` Kevin Traynor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-08 2:07 Yongseok Koh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430202227.36167-1-yskoh@mellanox.com \
--to=yskoh@mellanox.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).