From: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
To: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] test/hash: rectify slaveid to point to valid cores
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 23:27:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190531232723.2030-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> (raw)
This patch rectifies slave_id passed to rte_eal_wait_lcore()
to point to valid cores in read-write lock-free concurrency test.
It also replaces a 'for' loop with RTE_LCORE_FOREACH API.
Fixes: dfd9d5537e876 ("test/hash: use existing lcore API")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
index 343a338b4ea8..af1ee9c34394 100644
--- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
@@ -126,11 +126,9 @@ get_enabled_cores_list(void)
uint32_t i = 0;
uint16_t core_id;
uint32_t max_cores = rte_lcore_count();
- for (core_id = 0; core_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE && i < max_cores; core_id++) {
- if (rte_lcore_is_enabled(core_id)) {
- enabled_core_ids[i] = core_id;
- i++;
- }
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(core_id) {
+ enabled_core_ids[i] = core_id;
+ i++;
}
if (i != max_cores) {
@@ -738,7 +736,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf,
enabled_core_ids[i]);
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -810,7 +808,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf,
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -886,7 +884,7 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results,
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -962,7 +960,7 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf,
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -1037,7 +1035,7 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -1132,12 +1130,12 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf,
for (i = rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1;
i <= rwc_core_cnt[m] + rwc_core_cnt[n];
i++)
- rte_eal_wait_lcore(i);
+ rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
writer_done = 1;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -1221,7 +1219,7 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results,
writer_done = 1;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 23:27 Dharmik Thakkar [this message]
2019-06-01 15:59 ` David Marchand
2019-06-03 16:56 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-06-03 19:31 ` David Marchand
2019-06-03 20:43 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-06-05 17:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190531232723.2030-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
--to=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).