patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	Mohammad Abdul Awal <mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] test/ipsec: fix a typo in function name
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:26:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200219112650.2260407-1-thomas@monjalon.net> (raw)

The name of the static function check_cryptodev_capablity()
is fixed for the word "capability".
There is no functional change.

The same typo is fixed in a comment in ip_fragmentation example.

Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 app/test/test_ipsec.c            | 4 ++--
 examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 7dc83fee7e..9e14472938 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ fill_crypto_xform(struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params,
 }
 
 static int
-check_cryptodev_capablity(const struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut,
+check_cryptodev_capability(const struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut,
 		uint8_t dev_id)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_idx cap_idx;
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
 
 	/* Find first valid crypto device */
 	for (i = 0; i < nb_devs; i++) {
-		rc = check_cryptodev_capablity(ut_params, i);
+		rc = check_cryptodev_capability(ut_params, i);
 		if (rc == 0) {
 			ts_params->valid_dev = i;
 			ts_params->valid_dev_found = 1;
diff --git a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
index 104612339c..28febf49e7 100644
--- a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
+++ b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint32_t port_mask)
 	}
 }
 
-/* Check L3 packet type detection capablity of the NIC port */
+/* Check L3 packet type detection capability of the NIC port */
 static int
 check_ptype(int portid)
 {
-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-19 11:26 Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-02-19 11:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-02-20 10:37   ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200219112650.2260407-1-thomas@monjalon.net \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).