From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96D1A055A for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:35:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA4A1C01; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:35:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BBF1C000 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:35:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id f19so387832wmh.1 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:35:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jPvdAlJtv+WcX8uavytES9ggC2223KHXQuRRO36hLmY=; b=O3Jj0GbpImpQWUK/P45RtOiMpZoIfBBzMprB9zNSHUcV2ewDQ5eGp5aCCB0/QGtLR+ 3JsmxTtcLxawSf9w3+DBziNSVeSXWVO5HkXwNdODS3zHm8faj4wjgrK6PJIKWv4JJ5Ao gGD9gWW4Wp4s07YY96z4F6DM3KTiDR1hEYJnxniY4xmQxB8rXlG2W2sBZCfmP5Q2rIcN 3aoql0uK8Q5lKsLVivqsQCf2J/TQSNByn2KMjg7KqsdLSb5QKXuYAmQmjk5Y3M8VrFhW MOiSgSUOG2XHGBLv6qyEGmUu3oNzb3hD0zPukJ1Uc67xoDrzJmWHEANWzRGio4M3X7kR JI/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jPvdAlJtv+WcX8uavytES9ggC2223KHXQuRRO36hLmY=; b=QXStpkqTPEz9BMd80q5HGLomzH9qBuSDoLsiOOb5eTD9dGLLQmJLBQlb2TB1RAqbGr NbvfK0OSWxNvzjZ5d3Dd77ilY8OlVRHPTab3LQkFIf9Tyyhv2iR2DRGvxVLlXvG1eXnq tFnoAtAU0uaWWTa9ppzgc3qESPcKkfZJw4ch3lr6CaqRSlQmaeDsCaBwviS1YfiqXSBb ByJQGwHFSqLaPTBdmvHpkO3X8jEwOcxnrReiFb8xjhw/VrgVfEeVpem/gTZUXQKkEE8P I55Gnjnb/bx3M5cnC909GC9HQLZZEoajXAv38WDTDOPo2MWE7NRhXvAlg9+6XdCR/WlE hxfA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVLXiM7GmeCw1KQZT4M67U45tRTj2TshGEQ30l3RPKpaCSm5E26 jc0Uapnpo6CmFQ2zc9FsfdlNEiC4jAQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJMzziwFzpWmD7pobj578Im8ialSg6er+sZUKGTGEciqUFaYf1oAXWw1hFny83HwvgwejpPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c851:: with SMTP id c17mr4052061wml.71.1582796143585; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:35:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l6sm7468974wrb.75.2020.02.27.01.35.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:35:43 -0800 (PST) From: luca.boccassi@gmail.com To: Prateek Agarwal Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , dpdk stable Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:33:58 +0000 Message-Id: <20200227093402.17690-38-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200227093402.17690-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> References: <20200217174546.25334-54-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20200227093402.17690-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'doc: fix quiescent state description in RCU guide' has been queued to stable release 19.11.1 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.1 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 02/29/20. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Thanks. Luca Boccassi --- >From 79e0f74ddba0a3c9bfb6d04fd4a5a2dfee9712a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Prateek Agarwal Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:05:29 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix quiescent state description in RCU guide [ upstream commit 07d311cc355721438578c1e140b4b316abf64f18 ] The quiescent state description refers to an incorrect thread. Fixes: 64994b56cfd7 ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism") Signed-off-by: Prateek Agarwal Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli --- doc/guides/prog_guide/rcu_lib.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rcu_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rcu_lib.rst index 8d0dfcf291..9b0bf138f6 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rcu_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rcu_lib.rst @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ wait till thread 2 enters quiescent state as well. However, the writer does not need to wait for reader thread 3 to enter quiescent state. Reader thread 3 was not accessing D1 when the delete -operation happened. So, reader thread 1 will not have a reference to the +operation happened. So, reader thread 3 will not have a reference to the deleted entry. It can be noted that, the critical sections for D2 is a quiescent state -- 2.20.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2020-02-27 09:31:57.028667300 +0000 +++ 0038-doc-fix-quiescent-state-description-in-RCU-guide.patch 2020-02-27 09:31:55.839946635 +0000 @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@ -From 07d311cc355721438578c1e140b4b316abf64f18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 79e0f74ddba0a3c9bfb6d04fd4a5a2dfee9712a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Prateek Agarwal Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:05:29 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix quiescent state description in RCU guide +[ upstream commit 07d311cc355721438578c1e140b4b316abf64f18 ] + The quiescent state description refers to an incorrect thread. Fixes: 64994b56cfd7 ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism") -Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Prateek Agarwal Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli