From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E637A0566 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571641BF96; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com (mail-pf1-f195.google.com [209.85.210.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3931BF96 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:18:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id f5so6613416pfk.9 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:18:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nzsuIDbxBQO7vopWQiqIHvypc7eu+B3vwVyuY6gSMUQ=; b=sItYSjw1/scR1jsLGM8eHdoXS47z2g9nos+6zsDCx6nSpD8vu/VXDmxrgBqpWbXf+2 XmR5AvoxcGEjPtcmVoGh7vkHzBAapGzON6cKPgcLiKjXrVusOwSC5uuVyvndsHcAhYSt AMMjb6FHbR0YqhXiU/HTQynE2CJDNugJXqW6xcGk8uF6btlZQZP/abpetgV7KKyH4uR6 L+DkrA/iceeNs6hNtj8poL4fTVxuwj0yCEDQjBokht0KczDw+lLOgyx1xEmnwhdLvXbZ jwP4cQndIhQIwLUIuFvv7HAGFXuWXKoSo6AhWY7qgQcfKClJ4bHfaWXadfsmm2qJKjBk 5FuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nzsuIDbxBQO7vopWQiqIHvypc7eu+B3vwVyuY6gSMUQ=; b=TBrtLlxetpi6ETA6gn0y67wA/yFpKsBxZQKhHw4B3WEdf52AA5SBM0ZUjf2hIdMMls Ck+Um2VPQXrQ0swJSPuXEpG3gUxl1Kgaw+/cXv6+uCUMRKGuk9n2T/44yxx0fbMzEAv3 sV1zLQtKjLHq9n3ximgbgmqx3G0YDNE4AhF61XPnosKiuZY2vvmtH+5MbSqreevKADsk C7MgUtsk/51CrRphMnPUy+RFN7qaQMU0U4Xf5/qLzAKFYfl4KMH+qp0WxXd76MAcDzsx /RMPKzcB+ztz/kITFkWw1iwRWMW/yDmuMbMiU/YR7k87ZD9TDBry69Wid8G8NTMrhCaC rQUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ38jBwiFjnH3HzMpwqXzxhdUAU++euRI8PVhuADnOD6YxTx1/iY ZenJNOqEcRvp35DGRIIENJj6NA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtWDHVxypohLL0IuVwg+g6UxPbkxUqqh/1xDBpAd6/I/Lpqg+xzXNKL+WdfERLp8EgwNI/81g== X-Received: by 2002:a65:424a:: with SMTP id d10mr6939840pgq.84.1583853495252; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id md20sm2717009pjb.15.2020.03.10.08.18.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:18:06 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Muhammad Ahmad Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20200310081806.3f955075@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200310065036.4396-1-muhammad.ahmad@emumba.com> References: <20200310065036.4396-1-muhammad.ahmad@emumba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h:changed RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:50:36 +0500 Muhammad Ahmad wrote: > Change the RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN from 1518 to 1526 > > Bugzilla ID: 296 > > Fixes: c5b2d13 (net: add rte prefix to ether defines) > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Cc: Oliver Matz > > Reported-by: LAVA > Suggested-by: LAVA > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Ahmad > --- > lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h > index e069dc7fe..8953107f3 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h > +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ extern "C" { > (RTE_ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2 + \ > RTE_ETHER_TYPE_LEN) /**< Length of Ethernet header. */ > #define RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN 64 /**< Minimum frame len, including CRC. */ > -#define RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN 1518 /**< Maximum frame len, including CRC. */ > +#define RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN 1526 /**< Maximum frame len, including CRC. */ > #define RTE_ETHER_MTU \ > (RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN - RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN - \ > RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN) /**< Ethernet MTU. */ No that is abi change would impact a lot of code and drivers. The problem is the comment is wrong, not the value.