patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"wenzhuo.lu@intel.com" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"qi.z.zhang@intel.com" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Lijian Zhang <Lijian.Zhang@arm.com>, Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix link state timing issue on fiber	ports
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 16:36:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508083607.GE75514@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB46409E07980A5955D90F4109E9A20@VE1PR08MB4640.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On 05/08, Phil Yang wrote:
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix link state timing issue on fiber
>> ports
>> 
>> With some models of fiber ports (e.g. X520-2 device ID 0x10fb), it
>> is possible when a port is started to experience a timing issue
>> which prevents the link from ever being fully set up.
>> 
>> In ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(), if the media type is fiber and the
>> link is down, a flag (IXGBE_FLAG_NEED_LINK_CONFIG) is set. A callback
>> to ixgbe_dev_setup_link_thread_handler() is scheduled which should
>> try to set up the link and clear the flag afterwards.
>> 
>> If the device is started before the flag is cleared, the scheduled
>> callback is cancelled. This causes the flag to remain set and
>> subsequent calls to ixgbe_dev_link_update_share() return
>> without trying to retrieve the link state because the flag is set.
>> 
>> In ixgbe_dev_cancel_link_thread(), after cancelling the callback,
>> unset the flag on the device to avoid this condition.
>> 
>> Fixes: 819d0d1d57f1 ("net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> 
>> Bugzilla ID: 388
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijian Zhang <lijian.zhang@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
>> ---
>
>Ping.

This fix makes sense to me, thanks for the work.
And it seems can't be applied to latest dpdk-next-net-intel cleanly, could you
do a rebase?

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>
>Thanks,
>Phil
>
><Snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19  6:41 [dpdk-stable] " Phil Yang
2020-03-19 10:51 ` Lijian Zhang
2020-05-08  2:48 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Phil Yang
2020-05-08  8:36   ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2020-05-08 10:31     ` Phil Yang
2020-05-08 10:28 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2020-05-11  2:49   ` Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200508083607.GE75514@intel.com \
    --to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Lijian.Zhang@arm.com \
    --cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).