patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	dev@dpdk.org, haiyue.wang@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused next member
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:29:45 -0700
Message-ID: <20200609082945.527e6c59@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200609071533.GB7842@intel.com>

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:15:33 +0800
Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> wrote:

> On 06/09, Olivier Matz wrote:
> >Hi Xialong,
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:29:55PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote:  
> >> TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
> >> mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's
> >> next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te,
> >> next).
> >> 
> >> Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>  
> >
> >Good catch, I forgot to remove this field which was used in former
> >implementations. Thanks!
> >
> >I suggest to update the title to highlight it's about dynamic mbuf:
> >  mbuf: remove unused next member in dyn flag/field
> >
> >Apart from this:
> >Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>  
> 
> Thanks for the ack, I'll submit V2 with suggested subject.
> 
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong

Is the field visible in ABI?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-09 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-09  5:29 [dpdk-stable] " Xiaolong Ye
2020-06-09  7:12 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] mbuf: remove unused next member in dyn flag/field Xiaolong Ye
2020-06-11  7:42   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-09  7:17 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused next member Olivier Matz
2020-06-09  7:15   ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-06-09 15:29     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-06-10  0:54       ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200609082945.527e6c59@hermes.lan \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

patches for DPDK stable branches

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \
		stable@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index stable

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git