From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4566CA0518 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:01:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE8D1C030; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:01:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196791C02C for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y3so8066940wrl.4 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:01:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VRRRUTyhVzqo2/RYR8HzSee34xiTkwfZy5A9iEbgGdc=; b=YdzaxueB5yyQ711auI/BvdIWTWF5QP/eDxs3/5oALLVBLatXQmZ2301QkIMuE2pE0s fnYvIDgfW5ynMP3Cq9/oVw3sSuI6P1D7pBZzzoZFNNLbSLfa9ITcMCdo5S9XNiUmjqi7 ARyi+LIrlf/VEn33w+jAQWQn3w3cb6FWZrTMxyKNmndVQ63FL4eyvsMuzZKLwNa87jmj XdJnuth1acuv613Y1aWybO51iHqCw13Qqq6JVT1czIl8Rlny2BW2gFd0Dy9xQErOvWue o5yt2Kg9K+wctSWZUasDhm8qX032okiE+eT44/5UNu7mE1RbOlr7DWTyQSF5Eyz8BXei bk4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VRRRUTyhVzqo2/RYR8HzSee34xiTkwfZy5A9iEbgGdc=; b=IZFsmkg3G3q4hPUfANglh3K7o1WB+PUszV7QK0G9kVYC4J9mA1hJs8JFcc8cObRi9b e0/4gvwlzRKPR1nUYLTIaXPl/4FcHVzyhFN+5bwVvw/CG0Urf0NlJAwXc0YE8disDY24 SHNRDdi1Ta/ptqe7SXSo5QXyBPpHKxTWnpFCKMao7wINpHEK0QWhpx8XO7j/82ESdZPh W6WqO7qQY+Lhtf6j3/kCMrqGsruz7Yd5lYMeeFrR/y41bxA+0pNcqKdAwMrd/zb7Hsvr 7ScXu0RX4NQSB8OQZaL55/u73fPP2uoKtpeeFRVvYzAkiURKznTcvVGyBKqPk93wBOzP 6NuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nrofTuhB7TVAXkHXegJ3Mtz/jGdnpbWTc7CkFqrVREUCu/9S2 DPpEhIDCfYFLirf6IS02B4WzjK4JZM8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQpvVwH+rhOIbzRrHhntdhlx8iMulQVE4NEbZxGg18gz+DZJezzUBHeW277hEiZKm60l9EdQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:618e:: with SMTP id j14mr8670943wru.374.1595592109855; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q188sm7226893wma.46.2020.07.24.05.01.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:01:47 -0700 (PDT) From: luca.boccassi@gmail.com To: Xiaolong Ye Cc: Olivier Matz , dpdk stable Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:57:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20200724120030.1863487-23-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200724120030.1863487-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> References: <20200724120030.1863487-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'mbuf: remove unused next member in dynamic flag/field' has been queued to stable release 19.11.4 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.4 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 07/26/20. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Thanks. Luca Boccassi --- >From d1243b7c1a4236ecc7adc54840db5cc4efd7b8e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xiaolong Ye Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:12:56 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused next member in dynamic flag/field [ upstream commit c67a423c53e9f891204fafcd9481ee1db0ec3b80 ] TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te, next). Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags") Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye Acked-by: Olivier Matz --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c index d6931f847..953e3ec31 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ #define RTE_MBUF_DYN_MZNAME "rte_mbuf_dyn" struct mbuf_dynfield_elt { - TAILQ_ENTRY(mbuf_dynfield_elt) next; struct rte_mbuf_dynfield params; size_t offset; }; @@ -31,7 +30,6 @@ static struct rte_tailq_elem mbuf_dynfield_tailq = { EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(mbuf_dynfield_tailq); struct mbuf_dynflag_elt { - TAILQ_ENTRY(mbuf_dynflag_elt) next; struct rte_mbuf_dynflag params; unsigned int bitnum; }; -- 2.20.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2020-07-24 12:53:49.513285924 +0100 +++ 0023-mbuf-remove-unused-next-member-in-dynamic-flag-field.patch 2020-07-24 12:53:48.211005044 +0100 @@ -1,15 +1,16 @@ -From c67a423c53e9f891204fafcd9481ee1db0ec3b80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From d1243b7c1a4236ecc7adc54840db5cc4efd7b8e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xiaolong Ye Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:12:56 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused next member in dynamic flag/field +[ upstream commit c67a423c53e9f891204fafcd9481ee1db0ec3b80 ] + TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te, next). Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags") -Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye Acked-by: Olivier Matz