From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDE0A052B for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:55:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9C61C023; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:55:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEE81C002 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id t14so3956243wmi.3 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:55:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eNqN0FXs9P3XBQf7G1GeUXyPa100mAcFRrpaun8LHdk=; b=NiOGi6vQk+i6RaBXe2FS2O3qsSpVS9n3wNymd+ZTSvg4p6iZ8POGS2kiRlpk5N4xiO 1GKWKewxZqfZ45fmqot1GCKvCVcvCD3rOFLjwYSEviOJ15BkSjhKGKrcb1icCXWpUS7h PU6Y1UKiwKE63UFDEHuUY5zqxaO63eDTpYB0a54+bLSs5ftJ1EDYf8GB8tXbKnnW+U95 GBp6NCjSZnQsByubYQrtab1dVy1B9klOrhNBCcqS7eTFCoeWCKaGeraLKb0rX127eF12 9OGCCbRkcKksQb4OvLc33xGDQ0JbSA8BjO0Ev0eXQzDW+cIFbEd2zKWXPyNeJZFtSqUb Nd2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eNqN0FXs9P3XBQf7G1GeUXyPa100mAcFRrpaun8LHdk=; b=b7H/fMKEhn6mi0BYMAQ/QcqRIIy6ia/yPf+imwYPkhOzbzXW8mxuM9CCZx6e1EXIIq YQzXpIckem6Z5nPxr7hYB3ZfpHTraR2ijNVBgM4oUkGo9cKrFi82L5uvtMQ5m5h+sKqp 6nr8RaZ3pjJTNSqFCGBDDqBJD95fSZdkp+Rtd9Wp9mzFW6ZJl5RHXicc1S7tIa4QTSDG ggu09DlZzYff/nbTRCuP2V6DkzxHbU71Ssn7zTfAPA1Db7cldEqG8Eh2b1nm2w+rTFZq KXCiovPXmPrdAiV/wUEC7EubV4DGy68yTcPLU9ZVCCwJqDfYMOvNfgVFOjKeLn1F/iuH Iiig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PTInUuAMstFnPPolwgNz6BT/pB+It4b/QsZaIfWjFVeFMOh41 JKcPWcEambuuktSDV7sLUnSZZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWHX1WPqpHk2MEgm3IJKyZ/EuPXAImbjarJB0PL8XlUC4ZblJC4pf76inXXI6LlI0pIkvh0w== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb46:: with SMTP id v6mr4043187wmj.73.1596200117987; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (2a01cb0c0005a600345636f7e65ed1a0.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb0c:5:a600:3456:36f7:e65e:d1a0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x204sm20698907wmg.2.2020.07.31.05.55.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:55:16 +0200 From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Cc: Wisam Jaddo <wisamm@mellanox.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Raslan <rasland@mellanox.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org> Message-ID: <20200731125516.GG5869@platinum> References: <1582204709-7992-1-git-send-email-wisamm@mellanox.com> <1582210386-27331-1-git-send-email-wisamm@mellanox.com> <CAJFAV8x7HwFAiz9nw=zQ1t7ZzSwbJCuQGKf0XTv3o4SEU4y6mw@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x7HwFAiz9nw=zQ1t7ZzSwbJCuQGKf0XTv3o4SEU4y6mw@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] cmdline: increase maximum line length X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/> List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> Hi, Ressurecting this old thread. On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:28:15PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > This patch is flagged as an ABI breakage: > https://travis-ci.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/289313318#L2273 > In case we want this fix for 20.11, should we do a deprecation notice in 20.08? Olivier > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:53 PM Wisam Jaddo <wisamm@mellanox.com> wrote: > > > > This increase due to the usage of cmdline in dpdk applications > > as config commands such as testpmd do for rte_flow rules creation. > > > > The current size of buffer is not enough to fill > > many cases of rte_flow commands validation/creation. > > > > rte_flow now can have outer items, inner items, modify > > actions, meta data actions, duplicate action, fate action and > > more in one single rte flow, thus 512 char will not be enough > > to validate such rte flow rules. > > > > Such change shouldn't affect the memory since the cmdline > > reading again using the same buffer. > > I don't get your point here. > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > This is not a fix. > > > -- > David Marchand >