From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
stable@dpdk.org,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] lib/rcu: avoid literal suffix warning in C++ mode
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 23:47:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904204734.17042-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831213811.21521-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Sequences like "value = %"PRIu64 (no space before PRIu64) are parsed as
a single preprocessor token, user-defined-string-literal, in C++11
onwards. While modern compilers are smart enough to parse this properly,
GCC 9.3.0 generates warnings like:
rte_rcu_qsbr.h:555:26: warning: invalid suffix on literal; C++11
requires a space between literal and string macro [-Wliteral-suffix]
Add spaces around format specifier macros to make public headers
compatible with C++ without causing warnings. Make similar changes in C
source for style consistency within the library.
Fixes: 64994b56c ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
---
v2: fix subject line, adjust C source for style consistency.
lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c | 13 +++++++------
lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
index aebfdb0da..a5f9de326 100644
--- a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
+++ b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
@@ -244,10 +244,10 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v)
fprintf(f, "\n");
- fprintf(f, " Token = %"PRIu64"\n",
+ fprintf(f, " Token = %" PRIu64 "\n",
__atomic_load_n(&v->token, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE));
- fprintf(f, " Least Acknowledged Token = %"PRIu64"\n",
+ fprintf(f, " Least Acknowledged Token = %" PRIu64 "\n",
__atomic_load_n(&v->acked_token, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE));
fprintf(f, "Quiescent State Counts for readers:\n");
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v)
id = i << __RTE_QSBR_THRID_INDEX_SHIFT;
while (bmap) {
t = __builtin_ctzl(bmap);
- fprintf(f, "thread ID = %u, count = %"PRIu64", lock count = %u\n",
+ fprintf(f, "thread ID = %u, count = %" PRIu64 ", lock count = %u\n",
id + t,
__atomic_load_n(
&v->qsbr_cnt[id + t].cnt,
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_enqueue(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq, void *e)
* other issues.
*/
rte_log(RTE_LOG_INFO, rte_rcu_log_type,
- "%s(): Skipped enqueuing token = %"PRIu64"\n",
+ "%s(): Skipped enqueuing token = %" PRIu64 "\n",
__func__, dq_elem->token);
rte_errno = ENOSPC;
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ int rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_enqueue(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq, void *e)
}
rte_log(RTE_LOG_INFO, rte_rcu_log_type,
- "%s(): Enqueued token = %"PRIu64"\n", __func__, dq_elem->token);
+ "%s(): Enqueued token = %" PRIu64 "\n",
+ __func__, dq_elem->token);
return 0;
}
@@ -449,7 +450,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq, unsigned int n,
rte_ring_dequeue_elem_finish(dq->r, 1);
rte_log(RTE_LOG_INFO, rte_rcu_log_type,
- "%s(): Reclaimed token = %"PRIu64"\n",
+ "%s(): Reclaimed token = %" PRIu64 "\n",
__func__, dq_elem->token);
dq->free_fn(dq->p, dq_elem->elem, 1);
diff --git a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
index a98e8f0f8..aa237cf75 100644
--- a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
+++ b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, unsigned int thread_id)
__atomic_store_n(&v->qsbr_cnt[thread_id].cnt,
t, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
- __RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG, "%s: update: token = %"PRIu64", Thread ID = %d",
+ __RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG, "%s: update: token = %" PRIu64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, thread_id);
}
@@ -580,13 +580,13 @@ __rte_rcu_qsbr_check_selective(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, uint64_t t, bool wait)
while (bmap) {
j = __builtin_ctzl(bmap);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: check: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Bit Map = 0x%"PRIx64", Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: check: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Bit Map = 0x%" PRIx64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, bmap, id + j);
c = __atomic_load_n(
&v->qsbr_cnt[id + j].cnt,
__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: status: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %"PRIu64", Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: status: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %" PRIu64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, c, id+j);
/* Counter is not checked for wrap-around condition
@@ -643,12 +643,12 @@ __rte_rcu_qsbr_check_all(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, uint64_t t, bool wait)
for (i = 0, cnt = v->qsbr_cnt; i < v->max_threads; i++, cnt++) {
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: check: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: check: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, i);
while (1) {
c = __atomic_load_n(&cnt->cnt, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: status: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %"PRIu64", Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: status: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %" PRIu64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, c, i);
/* Counter is not checked for wrap-around condition
@@ -725,10 +725,10 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_check(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, uint64_t t, bool wait)
/* Check if all the readers have already acknowledged this token */
if (likely(t <= v->acked_token)) {
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: check: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d",
+ "%s: check: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d",
__func__, t, wait);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: status: least acked token = %"PRIu64"",
+ "%s: status: least acked token = %" PRIu64,
__func__, v->acked_token);
return 1;
}
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 21:38 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] rcu: " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-09-04 6:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-04 20:47 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2020-09-05 1:47 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] lib/rcu: " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-10-05 22:47 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200904204734.17042-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).