From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E2DA0524 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:20:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DA54067B; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:20:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD1E1606C3 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:20:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u14so7297043wri.3 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:20:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rs1L64wZ9dzppNGPFmgbznYRch1vgMeQxjzdhLVC5W8=; b=KKH+x6ZoTplUV8RHKzgRlfFYT+ALGu9XRNuG6qu3Yr+Uq0n5nImKa5LuulJ51CGeRX W3vqttJWnOSfu7N7205pIWE9BstWAcwxh0PwR4aUHo7ifAbFIMBL4x69r+POl1zY2gzF Tkr5VqH1h/xSGIYK9CrQNMqBb5gVNjx5zfJsMJLGOx2F3LN62tqOZ2/Ex+L/T+ETcDOd y82MARJ9eI2QNWtD/pYkZLfhrfLUesHyn/NCOmEEPiOpNTj5H9si4qLPkhfmIBt8Aj90 enGn0D8qfkAs0XxWO57j3WnTq7DEedrJnQybFjl82GB8+QB7e52LVMTnAW+WVavuhpgF 3ckQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rs1L64wZ9dzppNGPFmgbznYRch1vgMeQxjzdhLVC5W8=; b=Labs9Nl3KZVD+JLnVzAGUMrIJ8HBD8NuJnnS9oC249FM0/kKFK203ntDHvUpd4L1GK /t8+VPtz+Qu9UNDlGh6F1JBMNu5jR2M0o/fcRvox3kWz4ZlR4B6JFIL8z9Nllk+8Sa2L CRkYBbwBCFSZ/+owqBsDew1ynatiKnPXhcg1MIBD/t6OYQruQzYXzDxc9gtq58lFz/O0 l5zLHXO8vPvmlA7gUNTddvP70uxpZSyS4czktbltKOSXd6E1/AIiYcoaAc3GKuewSFUN GiYULzoKKAWUp/8eFFw8L72a3JWerj16zJT94HEFoK0WgL2qgNGMu8CCBP3UE+NuUr2a 32Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+NxNrSdwxkw1bK5VCFeQpB0zMAbVluUWver2nM6som1X6B0a/ 7ETrHjd7auS06GRdyTYWe+ckIaG6x8Yzyw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6QMAE7IEDdMIH4+p4AhJo0gW/sNl5p0lOg0mHnI25bjvW8Prlyo5sm0WKvM+G1vb1xllgnQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dd10:: with SMTP id a16mr4472795wrm.207.1612524024327; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s23sm8570353wmc.29.2021.02.05.03.20.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:20:23 -0800 (PST) From: luca.boccassi@gmail.com To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Fan Zhang , dpdk stable Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:15:06 +0000 Message-Id: <20210205111920.1272063-20-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210205111920.1272063-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> References: <20210205111920.1272063-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'app/crypto-perf: remove always true condition' has been queued to stable release 20.11.1 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.1 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 02/07/21. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/bluca/dpdk-stable This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/bluca/dpdk-stable/commit/d97fff4bd45b9120ca6bbfdddfbe26d45dd16e3f Thanks. Luca Boccassi --- >From d97fff4bd45b9120ca6bbfdddfbe26d45dd16e3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ferruh Yigit Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:58:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] app/crypto-perf: remove always true condition [ upstream commit 427ec3b7285d8e8b939f7e5db4976476c931c005 ] This is already 'else' leg of the opposite comparison, simple 'else' will be logically same. Fixes: f8be1786b1b8 ("app/crypto-perf: introduce performance test application") Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit Acked-by: Fan Zhang --- app/test-crypto-perf/main.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c index 5f035519c3..99f86e9019 100644 --- a/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c +++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ cperf_check_test_vector(struct cperf_options *opts, if (opts->cipher_algo == RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_NULL) { if (test_vec->plaintext.data == NULL) return -1; - } else if (opts->cipher_algo != RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_NULL) { + } else { if (test_vec->plaintext.data == NULL) return -1; if (test_vec->plaintext.length < opts->max_buffer_size) @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ cperf_check_test_vector(struct cperf_options *opts, return -1; if (test_vec->plaintext.length < opts->max_buffer_size) return -1; - } else if (opts->cipher_algo != RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_NULL) { + } else { if (test_vec->plaintext.data == NULL) return -1; if (test_vec->plaintext.length < opts->max_buffer_size) -- 2.29.2 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2021-02-05 11:18:30.214814461 +0000 +++ 0020-app-crypto-perf-remove-always-true-condition.patch 2021-02-05 11:18:28.602687228 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From 427ec3b7285d8e8b939f7e5db4976476c931c005 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From d97fff4bd45b9120ca6bbfdddfbe26d45dd16e3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit 427ec3b7285d8e8b939f7e5db4976476c931c005 ] + @@ -10 +11,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org