From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8C6A0A0E
for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:08:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0573C4003E;
Mon, 10 May 2021 18:08:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-dm6nam10on2073.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.93.73])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5604003E
for <stable@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
b=hN3o7mgk+Js5j5rJ1S2nDNqLl3vYgMe92oG58iGijzPhzGJe7sX7AbgEWA7M8WguZmyV0apwU8Bli8P4uSqr0y5npCXLqVaDx5n7e/i+dBnHv+a76so3onFDLZ1PNGe6CbOrp81pIgjf1A6n4v+UnV8O+EUXb2ukhMKiBRSsniK+nCm5M4j89r76wzS/bL7j/ILY2x84TI226MpxP3UaNZXp5wukqu/axCM5VA/QmxD+Pp4xCnJLeJH5ifsTuNfmnl/FDMbOzohjbK1/DJKda6UyJS3PFpWHLJX/T8pHFqzkLVSxkfRPfWwYFWf3JPCkz5nSKe0vTNJgQy3madC5xQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=arcselector9901;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=fBy3eaKTKCtNNUydcWtsU+GnJmN2aqyV+ewelkz06KI=;
b=D7bck12Ffbkvmn36qEkq34ft7VoUKSn3bJbsE0JN1frpiy3mU23+CECAsEmTyE3qEcEFZrLAR/xmLxHblDlKpIxqvoAxhsMCThT67lSQ5aBNLGE4twGsWdxSmVunk9SX/7r3BErT7kSm4zzQ8nYDvhOOzOR2EO9hoC+vPuMx1Rc3n9uFl0wzIInRHfFrd7xNuxS1Dl5s8KYEJ41JUO4yR+23YaL538L9TzqoWOtMFwbzpMzPweYDrylfOvVZc9sxbhZ2QgM3tjsAvzfFNknQslXQyxDmoet4KG9vILquXcjExzcdgmtUkCe/58uRoZHCmfXIGyWJKP97ytL2KoOQ+w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is
216.228.112.34) smtp.rcpttodomain=broadcom.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com;
dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com;
dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com;
s=selector2;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=fBy3eaKTKCtNNUydcWtsU+GnJmN2aqyV+ewelkz06KI=;
b=fmY/cuOT4vqqKhYX3AOl2yPTGaI+mWRjzdNpSj4rBd1vineQB+Z7afGwf6Y6qX+9NPH7YxHcRa0yBSfzow5TUBuJTit/U0E5LDu4j/XR65ihqm37jgKLLqhj67sC7P/jXUJ3+x4mvzoRHh8O8E628xRjub+22LCNStigAaV//Wpt1NPX+WqETZana99KjMmfGwzVouyyUxJza1K8DEHjjDf9UdSKZttOT/PdtysemOGt7Ybpov+gesNXK0n+gJbho4gqqWqPdQwgBxtECPbHc2+98e3+/UngAd3hdGfhK/IQRFIhBKtSpL16GzC8pO9utEVvTubhGCFKQTBvVKkk4w==
Received: from BN9PR03CA0220.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:f8::15)
by MN2PR12MB4239.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:1d2::11)
with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.29; Mon, 10 May
2021 16:08:52 +0000
Received: from BN8NAM11FT045.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2603:10b6:408:f8:cafe::d1) by BN9PR03CA0220.outlook.office365.com
(2603:10b6:408:f8::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.24 via Frontend
Transport; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:08:52 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.112.34)
smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; broadcom.com; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;broadcom.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com;
Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.112.34) by
BN8NAM11FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.47) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id
15.20.4108.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:08:51 +0000
Received: from nvidia.com (172.20.145.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com
(172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 10 May
2021 16:08:49 +0000
From: Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
To: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
CC: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Ajit Khaparde
<ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:05 +0800
Message-ID: <20210510160258.30982-56-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1
In-Reply-To: <20210510160258.30982-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
References: <20210510160258.30982-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Originating-IP: [172.20.145.6]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To
HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13)
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 5a626ad8-9663-4f1f-3625-08d913cde777
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR12MB4239:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <MN2PR12MB4239BB4910A7CE25FA8A26F5A1549@MN2PR12MB4239.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:221;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.112.34; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;
IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:schybrid03.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE;
SFS:(4636009)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(36840700001)(46966006)(82740400003)(7636003)(53546011)(7696005)(47076005)(83380400001)(2616005)(86362001)(356005)(36860700001)(966005)(82310400003)(26005)(36756003)(4326008)(16526019)(186003)(36906005)(70586007)(5660300002)(8936002)(426003)(478600001)(336012)(6286002)(6916009)(54906003)(8676002)(55016002)(2906002)(70206006)(6666004)(1076003)(316002);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2021 16:08:51.9550 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5a626ad8-9663-4f1f-3625-08d913cde777
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.112.34];
Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT045.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR12MB4239
Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'net/bnxt: fix VF info allocation' has been
queued to stable release 20.11.2
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
<mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
<mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Hi,
FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.2
Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 05/12/21. So please
shout if anyone has objections.
Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.
Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk
This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk/commit/274ff8673a91b76981f5e6dbcd88211c8c3f3bf4
Thanks.
Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
---
>From 274ff8673a91b76981f5e6dbcd88211c8c3f3bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:37:28 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] net/bnxt: fix VF info allocation
Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
[ upstream commit 01406837bf49950fa3a3fdd9d62eb7e0819383e4 ]
1. Renamed bnxt_hwrm_alloc_vf_info()/bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info to
bnxt_alloc_vf_info()/bnxt_free_vf_info as it does not
issue any HWRM command to fw.
2. Fix missing unlock when memory allocation fails.
Fixes: b7778e8a1c00 ("net/bnxt: refactor to properly allocate resources for PF/VF")
Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
index f247603edb..1c7a4d76ed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static void bnxt_drv_uninit(struct bnxt *bp)
rte_memzone_free((const struct rte_memzone *)bp->rx_mem_zone);
bp->rx_mem_zone = NULL;
- bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(bp);
+ bnxt_free_vf_info(bp);
rte_free(bp->grp_info);
bp->grp_info = NULL;
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
index a27ecfac7e..b520846e07 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
@@ -673,10 +673,13 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_ptp_qcfg(struct bnxt *bp)
return 0;
}
-void bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp)
+void bnxt_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp)
{
int i;
+ if (bp->pf->vf_info == NULL)
+ return;
+
for (i = 0; i < bp->pf->max_vfs; i++) {
rte_free(bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_table);
bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_table = NULL;
@@ -687,6 +690,50 @@ void bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp)
bp->pf->vf_info = NULL;
}
+static int bnxt_alloc_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp, uint16_t max_vfs)
+{
+ struct bnxt_child_vf_info *vf_info = bp->pf->vf_info;
+ int i;
+
+ if (vf_info)
+ bnxt_free_vf_info(bp);
+
+ vf_info = rte_zmalloc("bnxt_vf_info", sizeof(*vf_info) * max_vfs, 0);
+ if (vf_info == NULL) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc vf info\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ bp->pf->max_vfs = max_vfs;
+ for (i = 0; i < max_vfs; i++) {
+ vf_info[i].fid = bp->pf->first_vf_id + i;
+ vf_info[i].vlan_table = rte_zmalloc("VF VLAN table",
+ getpagesize(), getpagesize());
+ if (vf_info[i].vlan_table == NULL) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc VLAN table for VF %d\n", i);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ rte_mem_lock_page(vf_info[i].vlan_table);
+
+ vf_info[i].vlan_as_table = rte_zmalloc("VF VLAN AS table",
+ getpagesize(), getpagesize());
+ if (vf_info[i].vlan_as_table == NULL) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc VLAN AS table for VF %d\n", i);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ rte_mem_lock_page(vf_info[i].vlan_as_table);
+
+ STAILQ_INIT(&vf_info[i].filter);
+ }
+
+ bp->pf->vf_info = vf_info;
+
+ return 0;
+err:
+ bnxt_free_vf_info(bp);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
{
int rc = 0;
@@ -694,7 +741,6 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
struct hwrm_func_qcaps_output *resp = bp->hwrm_cmd_resp_addr;
uint16_t new_max_vfs;
uint32_t flags;
- int i;
HWRM_PREP(&req, HWRM_FUNC_QCAPS, BNXT_USE_CHIMP_MB);
@@ -712,43 +758,9 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
bp->pf->total_vfs = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->max_vfs);
new_max_vfs = bp->pdev->max_vfs;
if (new_max_vfs != bp->pf->max_vfs) {
- if (bp->pf->vf_info)
- bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(bp);
- bp->pf->vf_info = rte_zmalloc("bnxt_vf_info",
- sizeof(bp->pf->vf_info[0]) * new_max_vfs, 0);
- if (bp->pf->vf_info == NULL) {
- PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Alloc vf info fail\n");
- HWRM_UNLOCK();
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- bp->pf->max_vfs = new_max_vfs;
- for (i = 0; i < new_max_vfs; i++) {
- bp->pf->vf_info[i].fid =
- bp->pf->first_vf_id + i;
- bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_table =
- rte_zmalloc("VF VLAN table",
- getpagesize(),
- getpagesize());
- if (bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_table == NULL)
- PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
- "Fail to alloc VLAN table for VF %d\n",
- i);
- else
- rte_mem_lock_page(
- bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_table);
- bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_as_table =
- rte_zmalloc("VF VLAN AS table",
- getpagesize(),
- getpagesize());
- if (bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_as_table == NULL)
- PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
- "Alloc VLAN AS table for VF %d fail\n",
- i);
- else
- rte_mem_lock_page(
- bp->pf->vf_info[i].vlan_as_table);
- STAILQ_INIT(&bp->pf->vf_info[i].filter);
- }
+ rc = bnxt_alloc_vf_info(bp, new_max_vfs);
+ if (rc)
+ goto unlock;
}
}
@@ -807,6 +819,7 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
if (flags & HWRM_FUNC_QCAPS_OUTPUT_FLAGS_LINK_ADMIN_STATUS_SUPPORTED)
bp->fw_cap |= BNXT_FW_CAP_LINK_ADMIN;
+unlock:
HWRM_UNLOCK();
return rc;
@@ -817,6 +830,9 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
int rc;
rc = __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(bp);
+ if (rc == -ENOMEM)
+ return rc;
+
if (!rc && bp->hwrm_spec_code >= HWRM_SPEC_CODE_1_8_3) {
rc = bnxt_alloc_ctx_mem(bp);
if (rc)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h
index 11b3b1cea1..473e1f5395 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_port_phy_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp);
int bnxt_hwrm_oem_cmd(struct bnxt *bp, uint32_t entry_num);
int bnxt_clear_one_vnic_filter(struct bnxt *bp,
struct bnxt_filter_info *filter);
-void bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp);
+void bnxt_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp);
int bnxt_hwrm_first_vf_id_query(struct bnxt *bp, uint16_t fid,
uint16_t *first_vf_id);
int bnxt_hwrm_cfa_pair_alloc(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_representor *rep);
--
2.25.1
---
Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- - 2021-05-10 23:59:28.114374700 +0800
+++ 0057-net-bnxt-fix-VF-info-allocation.patch 2021-05-10 23:59:26.410000000 +0800
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From 01406837bf49950fa3a3fdd9d62eb7e0819383e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 274ff8673a91b76981f5e6dbcd88211c8c3f3bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
+
+[ upstream commit 01406837bf49950fa3a3fdd9d62eb7e0819383e4 ]
@@ -12 +14,0 @@
-Cc: stable@dpdk.org
@@ -23 +25 @@
-index fae23a5c85..b561ff5520 100644
+index f247603edb..1c7a4d76ed 100644
@@ -26 +28 @@
-@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ static void bnxt_drv_uninit(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static void bnxt_drv_uninit(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -36 +38 @@
-index 5ef0845e8c..c16edc8956 100644
+index a27ecfac7e..b520846e07 100644
@@ -39 +41 @@
-@@ -788,10 +788,13 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_ptp_qcfg(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -673,10 +673,13 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_ptp_qcfg(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -54 +56 @@
-@@ -802,6 +805,50 @@ void bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -687,6 +690,50 @@ void bnxt_hwrm_free_vf_info(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -105 +107 @@
-@@ -809,7 +856,6 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -694,7 +741,6 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -113 +115 @@
-@@ -827,43 +873,9 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -712,43 +758,9 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -160 +162 @@
-@@ -922,6 +934,7 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -807,6 +819,7 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -168 +170 @@
-@@ -932,6 +945,9 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
+@@ -817,6 +830,9 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -179 +181 @@
-index 3d05acfe48..0c2e32ccbf 100644
+index 11b3b1cea1..473e1f5395 100644
@@ -182 +184 @@
-@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_port_phy_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp);
+@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_port_phy_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp);