From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7CFA0C3F for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 05:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30E74110C; Wed, 12 May 2021 05:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC3F410FF; Wed, 12 May 2021 05:57:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A74831B; Tue, 11 May 2021 20:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wls-arm-cavium06.shanghai.arm.com (wls-arm-cavium06.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.206.120]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A619E3F73B; Tue, 11 May 2021 20:57:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Richael Zhuang To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com, richael.zhuang@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org, David Hunt Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:57:09 +0800 Message-Id: <20210512035709.37755-3-richael.zhuang@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20210512035709.37755-1-richael.zhuang@arm.com> References: <20210422061540.23304-2-richael.zhuang@arm.com> <20210512035709.37755-1-richael.zhuang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/power: round cpuinfo cur freq only when using CPPC cpufreq X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On arm platform, the value in "/sys/.../cpuinfo_cur_freq" may not be exactly the same as what was set when using CPPC cpufreq driver. For other cpufreq driver, no need to round it currently, or else this check will fail with turbo enabled. For example, with acpi_cpufreq, cpuinfo_cur_freq can be 2401000 which is equal to freqs[0].It should not be rounded to 2400000. Fixes: 606a234c6d360 ("test/power: round CPU frequency to check") Cc: richael.zhuang@arm.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Richael Zhuang --- app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c b/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c index 87d07191d..0e195afc9 100644 --- a/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c +++ b/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ check_cur_freq(unsigned lcore_id, uint32_t idx) FILE *f; char fullpath[PATH_MAX]; char buf[BUFSIZ]; + enum power_management_env env; uint32_t cur_freq; + uint32_t freq_conv; int ret = -1; int i; @@ -71,15 +73,18 @@ check_cur_freq(unsigned lcore_id, uint32_t idx) goto fail_all; cur_freq = strtoul(buf, NULL, TEST_POWER_CONVERT_TO_DECIMAL); - - /* convert the frequency to nearest 100000 value - * Ex: if cur_freq=1396789 then freq_conv=1400000 - * Ex: if cur_freq=800030 then freq_conv=800000 - */ - unsigned int freq_conv = 0; - freq_conv = (cur_freq + TEST_FREQ_ROUNDING_DELTA) - / TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; - freq_conv = freq_conv * TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; + freq_conv = cur_freq; + + env = rte_power_get_env(); + if (env == PM_ENV_CPPC_CPUFREQ) { + /* convert the frequency to nearest 100000 value + * Ex: if cur_freq=1396789 then freq_conv=1400000 + * Ex: if cur_freq=800030 then freq_conv=800000 + */ + freq_conv = (cur_freq + TEST_FREQ_ROUNDING_DELTA) + / TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; + freq_conv = freq_conv * TEST_ROUND_FREQ_TO_N_100000; + } ret = (freqs[idx] == freq_conv ? 0 : -1); -- 2.20.1