From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88713A0C3F
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:06:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829954003F;
	Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:06:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from NAM04-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-dm6nam08on2048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.102.48])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B724003F
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:06:01 +0200 (CEST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
 b=KPZ1L6/si2KKhJidsyc/I+AKgkWqdK3ftc5s8dL9alsdbVXk6wAsldmK2tLXqb1J0NXyO1j50R58Pf27N2o8UKbUEk2kaZ0QTU3SQb9SeDThhxYu+4Zsb+by8R0oKR/NXO2mNe4bz6l0jaOjnQ1e6GSpVbM423saYULNBmmBaweAmRHJvEqgvrNpQlMhE8FBu5DqThdLYxDQqGCBsP0AykgTDXOs/12vHVxvHvEh7bNO17nIBI9SzC3uubPjV43Kkv/zdRB7/IuMfre5dJmeo9LJHbIXUXKy5MmxWVbaieaxiAJyuzXLLnk1IGcUbzlYUZrpl28SfAcm1+6Qm1eJZA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; 
 s=arcselector9901;
 h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
 bh=xja5FuuZBX+vYtx6P80X+fv4Tzw6ZMXS3tsaYrsTTGY=;
 b=gLbcd470T3SxnRldFtj2zd8SPUpq8vJGfEqY8QGOFVuNOgPr8smghplBQQq6OkSI1lHFb5SwnV9x2bLQTpA7Ng/jxQcuj9aNZRgnS2JXjD7TnTMurKb9LbpUMDfcmyY/OwUoF3bVepj5akv1rdnJz4PWR2Hnv/dg1SRPmCXkfm5oHx9fxEcE9Wq31Ii1mmTATRkpOGFX5he/nz1nULK+NaLyTMGJ9Fm7/H5hAuyRaVzVD0ytcncNMWf59ukoSSyHB/uW0x6NlXkgas5zqF9HnVXHSlPlQuM4XxNKwGleDZew3QrzHWvLI2RR6HlTUMe1h4IEnRDWCYvlPGimKFE2/w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is
 216.228.112.34) smtp.rcpttodomain=intel.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com;
 dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com;
 dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com;
 s=selector2;
 h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
 bh=xja5FuuZBX+vYtx6P80X+fv4Tzw6ZMXS3tsaYrsTTGY=;
 b=OyvxqGMoauLnf+nQAhMwB1S9Q/shjirR/fFnhnnUFzHWYrii/FOD26Vr+kbOtFq5qua7YmsDmjNRkIvisABwi5b8gd2GKBh7+5iYLmhI0oCAM/979xziewSehukF2nmQ5SzPtBDr/PHM82vVRHDruYc5bpSHQxlP9qoF8YqONx++VT7Gc9FLCtP4MlQ9ho2q+ytMS9m1k8KIz6GQ9U8k99/pvQjEMooSmdOfw1+veeZVceN44BlZZB5lLmjBuzrZPb+KbuUv3VR5cY6vXNKjkHGGsj611EhA7kbWNTSdk1Krak08dXZXs015HFUz+IqH3U5UlFmDXmabZbL7Ai1xzw==
Received: from MWHPR07CA0023.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:116::33)
 by MN2PR12MB4189.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:1d8::22)
 with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.22; Fri, 11 Jun
 2021 23:05:59 +0000
Received: from CO1NAM11FT027.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
 (2603:10b6:300:116:cafe::98) by MWHPR07CA0023.outlook.office365.com
 (2603:10b6:300:116::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.21 via Frontend
 Transport; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:05:58 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.112.34)
 smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; intel.com; dkim=none (message not signed)
 header.d=none;intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com;
Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.112.34) by
 CO1NAM11FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.174.224) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id
 15.20.4219.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:05:58 +0000
Received: from nvidia.com (172.20.187.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com
 (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 11 Jun
 2021 23:05:56 +0000
From: Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
To: Hongbo Zheng <zhenghongbo3@huawei.com>
CC: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Min Hu <humin29@huawei.com>, Konstantin
 Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:01:45 +0800
Message-ID: <20210611230433.8208-11-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1
In-Reply-To: <20210611230433.8208-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
References: <20210510160258.30982-229-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
 <20210611230433.8208-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Originating-IP: [172.20.187.5]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To
 HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13)
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: d6cb8ef1-d770-4782-6865-08d92d2d79a9
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR12MB4189:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <MN2PR12MB4189D92B65AD69EF64E758FAA1349@MN2PR12MB4189.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.112.34; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;
 IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:schybrid03.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE;
 SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(346002)(136003)(46966006)(36840700001)(55016002)(426003)(26005)(966005)(36906005)(336012)(70586007)(2906002)(316002)(1076003)(4326008)(53546011)(70206006)(82310400003)(8676002)(83380400001)(5660300002)(16526019)(8936002)(82740400003)(6916009)(6666004)(7696005)(36756003)(86362001)(6286002)(2616005)(356005)(186003)(47076005)(478600001)(36860700001)(54906003)(7636003);
 DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; 
X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2021 23:05:58.6590 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d6cb8ef1-d770-4782-6865-08d92d2d79a9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.112.34];
 Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT027.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR12MB4189
Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'bpf: fix JSLT validation' has been queued to
 stable release 20.11.2
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.2

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 06/14/21. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk

This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk/commit/2c6016c807a7f54fba1d76ad4789a6cf381d618b

Thanks.

Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>

---
>From 2c6016c807a7f54fba1d76ad4789a6cf381d618b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hongbo Zheng <zhenghongbo3@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:30:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix JSLT validation
Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

[ upstream commit cdcee2ec9b81457f9059c3f3a007e69190672634 ]

In function 'eval_jcc', judgment 'op == EBPF_JLT' occurs
twice, as a result, the corresponding second statement
cannot be accessed.

This patch fix this problem.

Fixes: 8021917293d0 ("bpf: add extra validation for input BPF program")

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zheng <zhenghongbo3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
index 9214f15038..7b1291b382 100644
--- a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
+++ b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ eval_jcc(struct bpf_verifier *bvf, const struct ebpf_insn *ins)
 		eval_jsgt_jsle(trd, trs, frd, frs);
 	else if (op == EBPF_JSLE)
 		eval_jsgt_jsle(frd, frs, trd, trs);
-	else if (op == EBPF_JLT)
+	else if (op == EBPF_JSLT)
 		eval_jslt_jsge(trd, trs, frd, frs);
 	else if (op == EBPF_JSGE)
 		eval_jslt_jsge(frd, frs, trd, trs);
-- 
2.25.1

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2021-06-12 06:53:56.975795600 +0800
+++ 0011-bpf-fix-JSLT-validation.patch	2021-06-12 06:53:56.020000000 +0800
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From cdcee2ec9b81457f9059c3f3a007e69190672634 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 2c6016c807a7f54fba1d76ad4789a6cf381d618b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
+
+[ upstream commit cdcee2ec9b81457f9059c3f3a007e69190672634 ]
@@ -13 +15,0 @@
-Cc: stable@dpdk.org
@@ -19 +21 @@
- lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c | 2 +-
+ lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c | 2 +-
@@ -22 +24 @@
-diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
+diff --git a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
@@ -24,2 +26,2 @@
---- a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
-+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
+--- a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
++++ b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c