From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27BDA0C3F for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92AC4003F; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1anam02on2053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.96.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54794003F for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:15:32 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=As0lqGf4fvMi+USwIXyVm6FlgU2ZedsHfC7dyUx6ZQUKiKRV74adhHhHQtH/B9Giq4xHqjEaGW2vpnDQu4eEjehoayhmEQ4yEoVXGkaX/z+BpbkpiLIph2injgv9r+Mlik1Ef57eHO2mDAm+3Tgdpomlh5W0G9h+WxHen2xtiYVJ6qvgFsdzgCHynXBBV+swUBGe5qnRJnW/Ycu8Gdp1LYyRcTKYRAGyISzZ0eDq/WRK7pFogWBNkC3xBqIkQVWVgJ0HEF874yyceOR5KF2zBtJDfcvrsCVVqq0eRFNIw9e7XXVDrh1xbFenR5KEbiQYEt5lstyu9kSAcsYfNApdjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1R46omsJHExTy/2A0tvDyGwdwaGERgwSeKe7TH2o0lg=; b=UIagOfVH3Fy6dVJ2rfJMFrgZsWzFOXmorEnqIeDuevZb1wzUjshLniD6J5mpO5xYzZTJmP/hcE1C0kyTH7YH6fND9WEHb6cdGykrkc6uYa+sT8CfHnZfI1sZ2GyoynUc6Rsijl+8aV1JfyvNA0G8SFQfIRZrKooRDxJ6MTDmeQSvp/WWEV6K9k50RW03tkGgL4MPr3Pf3yF7geWrk42VvLzBtCY87N4IwO2+77hiruP7/KwrOrPn7pmWiaAflxesSIUeBOC2fj/WEM2OaJtU0eaZXvpewn/g8lE7FH8lEAEHH0pRQwaz7j+/Ca3+7rI2XxVZbLu9fuF1BVu7Aixccg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.112.34) smtp.rcpttodomain=semihalf.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1R46omsJHExTy/2A0tvDyGwdwaGERgwSeKe7TH2o0lg=; b=ph31EBd4odZqPpLMrj/eSGKS233kGXAaS1l8qFndR5iNagh7Jm1RRbQgYtjWlJDx+8UmqCNNQEIZ7gYWNNyNwWyNRMoi9Cy2blP3hcdT43RE9SL/G21dnYERMa1akxoFCpIYhF2DOOXQVGvWng9bZeVdSjISIs/3BE2vNKqzhYq4gV+1+gjI2CMgPngj8olufJZq2BWcP7qlGf9YrJJO4RRdN1jAq+su5Mc5L7O91n8ZwyCWXxs9Vdj/JVLh6u/lf+l7O0cPoTVEC39viHLRRR3dIlFLJKlXDLsdlF5kR2ODWImiF2GfYA0nSqONi4l3BQcb1LNtxbb/Whs6Q69wQA== Received: from BN6PR1101CA0003.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:4a::13) by MN2PR12MB3502.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:c9::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4195.24; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:15:31 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT009.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:4a:cafe::cd) by BN6PR1101CA0003.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:405:4a::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:15:31 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.112.34) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; semihalf.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;semihalf.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com; Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.112.34) by BN8NAM11FT009.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.176.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:15:30 +0000 Received: from nvidia.com (172.20.187.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:15:28 +0000 From: Xueming Li To: Igor Chauskin CC: Luca Boccassi , Shay Agroskin , Michal Krawczyk , dpdk stable Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:03:27 +0800 Message-ID: <20210611230433.8208-113-xuemingl@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210611230433.8208-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> References: <20210510160258.30982-229-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <20210611230433.8208-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [172.20.187.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 3afe9bde-0ab5-4486-e786-08d92d2ecebd X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR12MB3502: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.112.34; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:schybrid03.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(36840700001)(46966006)(70586007)(4326008)(316002)(478600001)(54906003)(86362001)(7696005)(16526019)(36906005)(53546011)(186003)(6286002)(36756003)(26005)(2616005)(426003)(336012)(55016002)(5660300002)(83380400001)(2906002)(8936002)(7636003)(8676002)(1076003)(82310400003)(70206006)(356005)(47076005)(36860700001)(6916009)(82740400003)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2021 23:15:30.8154 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3afe9bde-0ab5-4486-e786-08d92d2ecebd X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.112.34]; Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT009.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR12MB3502 Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'net/ena: fix parsing of large LLQ header device argument' has been queued to stable release 20.11.2 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.2 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 06/14/21. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk/commit/a5c0cca39ad6d6c78476734f4ae4f92640783e9d Thanks. Xueming Li --- >From a5c0cca39ad6d6c78476734f4ae4f92640783e9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Igor Chauskin Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 08:45:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net/ena: fix parsing of large LLQ header device argument Cc: Luca Boccassi [ upstream commit 9b312ad310024d00822cbc431677b59daa1e5e2c ] The code incorrectly checked the return value of comparison when parsing the argument key name. The return value of strcmp should be compared to 0 to identify a match. Fixes: 8a7a73f26cc9 ("net/ena: support large LLQ headers") Signed-off-by: Igor Chauskin Reviewed-by: Shay Agroskin Reviewed-by: Michal Krawczyk --- drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c index 6327b882b6..e7547af144 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c @@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ static int ena_process_bool_devarg(const char *key, } /* Now, assign it to the proper adapter field. */ - if (strcmp(key, ENA_DEVARG_LARGE_LLQ_HDR)) + if (strcmp(key, ENA_DEVARG_LARGE_LLQ_HDR) == 0) adapter->use_large_llq_hdr = bool_value; return 0; -- 2.25.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2021-06-12 06:53:59.500944100 +0800 +++ 0113-net-ena-fix-parsing-of-large-LLQ-header-device-argum.patch 2021-06-12 06:53:56.490000000 +0800 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From 9b312ad310024d00822cbc431677b59daa1e5e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From a5c0cca39ad6d6c78476734f4ae4f92640783e9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -4,0 +5,3 @@ +Cc: Luca Boccassi + +[ upstream commit 9b312ad310024d00822cbc431677b59daa1e5e2c ] @@ -11 +13,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -21 +23 @@ -index 5b073658d1..53647cc56e 100644 +index 6327b882b6..e7547af144 100644