patch 'test/ipsec: fix build with GCC 12' has been queued to stable release 19.11.13

[christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com]

Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.13

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 07/09/22. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue

This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commit/0d5d346bef5d2b971c6959738828729850e933e4

Thanks.

Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>

---
From 0d5d346bef5d2b971c6959738828729850e933e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:33:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test/ipsec: fix build with GCC 12
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

[ upstream commit 6e108b6a7c0c0699e6304f7b5706736b34d32607 ]

GCC 12 raises the following warning:

In function ‘_mm256_loadu_si256’,
    inlined from ‘rte_mov32’ at
        ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h:319:9,
    inlined from ‘rte_mov128’ at
        ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h:344:2,
    inlined from ‘rte_memcpy_generic’ at
        ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h:438:4,
    inlined from ‘rte_memcpy’ at
        ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h:882:10,
    inlined from ‘setup_test_string.constprop’ at
        ../app/test/test_ipsec.c:572:4:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/12/include/avxintrin.h:929:10: error:
    array subscript ‘__m256i_u[3]’ is partly outside array bounds of
    ‘const char[108]’ [-Werror=array-bounds]
  929 |   return *__P;
      |          ^~~~
../app/test/test_ipsec.c: In function ‘setup_test_string.constprop’:
../app/test/test_ipsec.c:539:12: note: at offset 96 into object
    ‘null_plain_data’ of size 108
  539 | const char null_plain_data[] =
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add a hint so that the compiler understands the copied data is within
the passed string boundaries.

Bugzilla ID: 848
Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
 app/test/test_ipsec.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index aa6d6db308..65924b0572 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -544,12 +544,14 @@ struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer  = {
 };
 
 static struct rte_mbuf *
-setup_test_string(struct rte_mempool *mpool,
-		const char *string, size_t len, uint8_t blocksize)
+setup_test_string(struct rte_mempool *mpool, const char *string,
+	size_t string_len, size_t len, uint8_t blocksize)
 {
 	struct rte_mbuf *m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mpool);
 	size_t t_len = len - (blocksize ? (len % blocksize) : 0);
 
+	RTE_VERIFY(len <= string_len);
+
 	if (m) {
 		memset(m->buf_addr, 0, m->buf_len);
 		char *dst = rte_pktmbuf_append(m, t_len);
@@ -1354,7 +1356,8 @@ test_ipsec_crypto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
 	/* Generate input mbuf data */
 	for (j = 0; j < num_pkts && rc == 0; j++) {
 		ut_params->ibuf[j] = setup_test_string(ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-			null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+			null_plain_data, sizeof(null_plain_data),
+			test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 		if (ut_params->ibuf[j] == NULL)
 			rc = TEST_FAILED;
 		else {
@@ -1472,7 +1475,8 @@ test_ipsec_inline_crypto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
 			/* Generate test mbuf data */
 			ut_params->obuf[j] = setup_test_string(
 				ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-				null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+				null_plain_data, sizeof(null_plain_data),
+				test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 			if (ut_params->obuf[j] == NULL)
 				rc = TEST_FAILED;
 		}
@@ -1540,16 +1544,17 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
 
 	/* Generate inbound mbuf data */
 	for (j = 0; j < num_pkts && rc == 0; j++) {
-		ut_params->ibuf[j] = setup_test_string(
-			ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-			null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+		ut_params->ibuf[j] = setup_test_string(ts_params->mbuf_pool,
+			null_plain_data, sizeof(null_plain_data),
+			test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 		if (ut_params->ibuf[j] == NULL)
 			rc = TEST_FAILED;
 		else {
 			/* Generate test mbuf data */
 			ut_params->obuf[j] = setup_test_string(
 				ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-				null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+				null_plain_data, sizeof(null_plain_data),
+				test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 			if (ut_params->obuf[j] == NULL)
 				rc = TEST_FAILED;
 		}
@@ -1649,7 +1654,8 @@ test_ipsec_inline_crypto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
 	/* Generate test mbuf data */
 	for (j = 0; j < num_pkts && rc == 0; j++) {
 		ut_params->ibuf[j] = setup_test_string(ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-			null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+			null_plain_data, sizeof(null_plain_data),
+			test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 		if (ut_params->ibuf[0] == NULL)
 			rc = TEST_FAILED;
 
@@ -1727,15 +1733,17 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
 	/* Generate test mbuf data */
 	for (j = 0; j < num_pkts && rc == 0; j++) {
 		ut_params->ibuf[j] = setup_test_string(ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-			null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+			null_plain_data, sizeof(null_plain_data),
+			test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 		if (ut_params->ibuf[0] == NULL)
 			rc = TEST_FAILED;
 
 		if (rc == 0) {
 			/* Generate test tunneled mbuf data for comparison */
 			ut_params->obuf[j] = setup_test_string(
-					ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-					null_plain_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+				ts_params->mbuf_pool, null_plain_data,
+				sizeof(null_plain_data), test_cfg[i].pkt_sz,
+				0);
 			if (ut_params->obuf[j] == NULL)
 				rc = TEST_FAILED;
 		}
@@ -1804,7 +1812,8 @@ test_ipsec_lksd_proto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
 	for (j = 0; j < num_pkts && rc == 0; j++) {
 		/* packet with sequence number 0 is invalid */
 		ut_params->ibuf[j] = setup_test_string(ts_params->mbuf_pool,
-			null_encrypted_data, test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
+			null_encrypted_data, sizeof(null_encrypted_data),
+			test_cfg[i].pkt_sz, 0);
 		if (ut_params->ibuf[j] == NULL)
 			rc = TEST_FAILED;
 	}
-- 
2.37.0

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2022-07-07 09:54:13.558870446 +0200
+++ 0057-test-ipsec-fix-build-with-GCC-12.patch	2022-07-07 09:54:10.953824544 +0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From 6e108b6a7c0c0699e6304f7b5706736b34d32607 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 0d5d346bef5d2b971c6959738828729850e933e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+[ upstream commit 6e108b6a7c0c0699e6304f7b5706736b34d32607 ]
+
@@ -38 +39,0 @@
-Cc: stable@dpdk.org
@@ -46 +47 @@
-index 8da025bf66..7047e17960 100644
+index aa6d6db308..65924b0572 100644
@@ -49 +50 @@
-@@ -554,12 +554,14 @@ struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer  = {
+@@ -544,12 +544,14 @@ struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer  = {
@@ -66 +67 @@
-@@ -1365,7 +1367,8 @@ test_ipsec_crypto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
+@@ -1354,7 +1356,8 @@ test_ipsec_crypto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
@@ -76 +77 @@
-@@ -1483,7 +1486,8 @@ test_ipsec_inline_crypto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
+@@ -1472,7 +1475,8 @@ test_ipsec_inline_crypto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
@@ -86 +87 @@
-@@ -1551,16 +1555,17 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
+@@ -1540,16 +1544,17 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
@@ -108 +109 @@
-@@ -1660,7 +1665,8 @@ test_ipsec_inline_crypto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
+@@ -1649,7 +1654,8 @@ test_ipsec_inline_crypto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
@@ -118 +119 @@
-@@ -1738,15 +1744,17 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
+@@ -1727,15 +1733,17 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_outb_burst_null_null(int i)
@@ -139 +140 @@
-@@ -1815,7 +1823,8 @@ test_ipsec_lksd_proto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)
+@@ -1804,7 +1812,8 @@ test_ipsec_lksd_proto_inb_burst_null_null(int i)