From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CD6A0543 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 18:14:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7DB40151; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 18:14:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E25B400D5 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 18:14:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id k8so10935210wrh.1 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=65rVvbikZBEP5CAtNxQJUWOq5KuYlJRd63iCfGldqJU=; b=KfOxOMYIHq6pzvW/7AyQTq49XYW5bxhFgsXta16TXtkKLV73rJwMcm1IpQzO3OkQXV Mc133TVL7VGLnZ1WuOTUSH5mVq9w2s9AJrzwyhc2UpC3mmzE0r3xh1RoBESSehSdRxUc rnkbby9EM/r3HurBD/V68OC2q7PpuPQLXswoecEhEuEMgD40x24FUuYjQnPoTfvN7AYz M4u/w/D+u/twDBowHd/m6gCt9WMtZ9nwDyb3rTyxjWD7NESA1yLIKVjVTX2OlBs3oqLo /rHPa3DKDavRN9BF3X28LBgZlxu4JZcg03eb1QhrP6zVOIi33PuePe3parwuBFhG05/C 3j7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=65rVvbikZBEP5CAtNxQJUWOq5KuYlJRd63iCfGldqJU=; b=H5DyBbfcYA/KWszkXukxwWYhtG1NfiQmMxQlRygA4Hgxt/5ymE2CRJ0v06ugjThqsO y0P5jVX9eM4RLK6f5ZSfvyvlezjM3UM3ywLWMehRUP3NZxPqCpeCLXIWAVMNze/U1LjC 3hgosq5Jn97fmMiXujxJUnonXyXqCnowPWlMnp3bUO2VF0+mvc6I9taJeHwqkheQXNGT 0NMxvzEKLKzxgF0Y5nSLh23YUYijPkgcWoGXFgf/Dinm+lMOE9tQpeR6RskfGCi5aKUc B81gD02+zFxz1qnnK3voKT/1pT5x8lLEgVNYLGkAFYyTDe+o7oyVMtCeOYqWPScu1UuC SRow== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1Br8OvH4C211rZjz1cEjqYbrM6cdFNaZ0OrYsbrVLp0Qfhot+9 wE5YScv5pqzAjVW4BTPUW6s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7j+Z5S/UKmSmlw5nJpOXaMSNZuQFZo+C5YqDoNF/5QwkDT+fSf8lo08OmxwW8pQMU9CKtCDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64cd:0:b0:236:6c69:cf03 with SMTP id f13-20020a5d64cd000000b002366c69cf03mr25180257wri.101.1667668463965; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:d307:1000:f1d3:eb5e:11f4:a7d9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e8-20020a5d5948000000b0023657e1b97esm2614761wri.11.2022.11.05.10.14.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:14:23 -0700 (PDT) From: luca.boccassi@gmail.com To: Radu Nicolau Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin , dpdk stable Subject: patch 'examples/ipsec-secgw: fix Tx checksum offload flag' has been queued to stable release 20.11.7 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 17:11:45 +0000 Message-Id: <20221105171146.1520039-46-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221105171146.1520039-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> References: <20221103092758.1099402-100-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20221105171146.1520039-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.7 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 11/07/22. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable/commit/a7e43cfe91ded4449218ef274f04d4d77e9d5a00 Thanks. Luca Boccassi --- >From a7e43cfe91ded4449218ef274f04d4d77e9d5a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Radu Nicolau Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:40:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix Tx checksum offload flag [ upstream commit c05f2e968867b9a86eaba528946bf421073f41a3 ] Fix a typo in computing port mask for Tx checksum offload capability. Fixes: 4edcee19fc20 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: use Tx checksum offload conditionally") Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin --- examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c index c2fb95f890..09fabbd6a3 100644 --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c @@ -2908,7 +2908,7 @@ main(int32_t argc, char **argv) port_init(portid, req_rx_offloads[portid], req_tx_offloads[portid]); if ((req_tx_offloads[portid] & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM)) - ipv4_cksum_port_mask = 1U << portid; + ipv4_cksum_port_mask |= 1U << portid; } for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) { -- 2.34.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2022-11-05 17:11:12.772760379 +0000 +++ 0046-examples-ipsec-secgw-fix-Tx-checksum-offload-flag.patch 2022-11-05 17:11:08.858946591 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From c05f2e968867b9a86eaba528946bf421073f41a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From a7e43cfe91ded4449218ef274f04d4d77e9d5a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit c05f2e968867b9a86eaba528946bf421073f41a3 ] + @@ -9 +10,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -18 +19 @@ -index e20bf50752..1d9982a786 100644 +index c2fb95f890..09fabbd6a3 100644 @@ -21 +22 @@ -@@ -2998,7 +2998,7 @@ main(int32_t argc, char **argv) +@@ -2908,7 +2908,7 @@ main(int32_t argc, char **argv) @@ -24 +25 @@ - if ((req_tx_offloads[portid] & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM)) + if ((req_tx_offloads[portid] & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM))