From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Yangchao Zhou <zhouyates@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Hemant@freescale.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kni: fix possible alloc_q starvation when mbufs are exhausted
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:39:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109083909.6536bce8@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221109060434.2012064-1-zhouyates@gmail.com>
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 14:04:34 +0800
Yangchao Zhou <zhouyates@gmail.com> wrote:
> In some scenarios, mbufs returned by rte_kni_rx_burst are not freed
> immediately. So kni_allocate_mbufs may be failed, but we don't know.
>
> Even worse, when alloc_q is completely exhausted, kni_net_tx in
> rte_kni.ko will drop all tx packets. kni_allocate_mbufs is never
> called again, even if the mbufs are eventually freed.
>
> In this patch, we always try to allocate mbufs for alloc_q.
>
> Don't worry about alloc_q being allocated too many mbufs, in fact,
> the old logic will gradually fill up alloc_q.
> Also, the cost of more calls to kni_allocate_mbufs should be acceptable.
>
> Fixes: 3e12a98fe397 ("kni: optimize Rx burst")
> Cc: Hemant@freescale.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou <zhouyates@gmail.com>
Since fifo_get returning 0 (no buffers) is very common would this
change impact performance.
If the problem is pool draining might be better to make the pool
bigger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 5:13 [PATCH] " Yangchao Zhou
2022-11-09 6:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Yangchao Zhou
2022-11-09 16:39 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-11-11 9:12 ` Matt
2022-12-09 16:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-30 4:23 ` [PATCH v3] " Yangchao Zhou
2023-01-03 12:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-04 11:57 ` Matt
2023-01-04 14:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-11 9:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221109083909.6536bce8@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=Hemant@freescale.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=zhouyates@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).