patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
To: olivier.matz@6wind.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
	thomas@monjalon.net, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	justin.he@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] test/mbuf: fix the forked process segment fault
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:01:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522060137.225154-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> (raw)

Access of any memory in the hugepage shared file-backed area will trigger
an unexpected forked child process segment fault. The root cause is DPDK
doesn't support fork model [1] (calling rte_eal_init() before fork()).
Forked child process can't be treated as a secondary process.

Hence fix it by avoiding fork and doing verification in the main process.

[1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-July/108106.html

Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_mbuf.c | 50 +++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
index 8d8d3b9386..efac01806b 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
@@ -1167,38 +1167,16 @@ test_failing_mbuf_sanity_check(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 	return TEST_SKIPPED;
 }
 #else
-
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <sys/resource.h>
-#include <sys/time.h>
-#include <sys/wait.h>
-
-/* use fork() to test mbuf errors panic */
-static int
-verify_mbuf_check_panics(struct rte_mbuf *buf)
+/* Verify if mbuf can pass the check */
+static bool
+mbuf_check_pass(struct rte_mbuf *buf)
 {
-	int pid;
-	int status;
+	const char *reason;
 
-	pid = fork();
+	if (rte_mbuf_check(buf, 1, &reason) == 0)
+		return true;
 
-	if (pid == 0) {
-		struct rlimit rl;
-
-		/* No need to generate a coredump when panicking. */
-		rl.rlim_cur = rl.rlim_max = 0;
-		setrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE, &rl);
-		rte_mbuf_sanity_check(buf, 1); /* should panic */
-		exit(0);  /* return normally if it doesn't panic */
-	} else if (pid < 0) {
-		printf("Fork Failed\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
-	wait(&status);
-	if(status == 0)
-		return -1;
-
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -1215,19 +1193,19 @@ test_failing_mbuf_sanity_check(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 		return -1;
 
 	printf("Checking good mbuf initially\n");
-	if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(buf) != -1)
+	if (!mbuf_check_pass(buf))
 		return -1;
 
 	printf("Now checking for error conditions\n");
 
-	if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(NULL)) {
+	if (mbuf_check_pass(NULL)) {
 		printf("Error with NULL mbuf test\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
 	badbuf = *buf;
 	badbuf.pool = NULL;
-	if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(&badbuf)) {
+	if (mbuf_check_pass(&badbuf)) {
 		printf("Error with bad-pool mbuf test\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
@@ -1235,7 +1213,7 @@ test_failing_mbuf_sanity_check(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 	if (RTE_IOVA_IN_MBUF) {
 		badbuf = *buf;
 		rte_mbuf_iova_set(&badbuf, 0);
-		if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(&badbuf)) {
+		if (mbuf_check_pass(&badbuf)) {
 			printf("Error with bad-physaddr mbuf test\n");
 			return -1;
 		}
@@ -1243,21 +1221,21 @@ test_failing_mbuf_sanity_check(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 
 	badbuf = *buf;
 	badbuf.buf_addr = NULL;
-	if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(&badbuf)) {
+	if (mbuf_check_pass(&badbuf)) {
 		printf("Error with bad-addr mbuf test\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
 	badbuf = *buf;
 	badbuf.refcnt = 0;
-	if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(&badbuf)) {
+	if (mbuf_check_pass(&badbuf)) {
 		printf("Error with bad-refcnt(0) mbuf test\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
 	badbuf = *buf;
 	badbuf.refcnt = UINT16_MAX;
-	if (verify_mbuf_check_panics(&badbuf)) {
+	if (mbuf_check_pass(&badbuf)) {
 		printf("Error with bad-refcnt(MAX) mbuf test\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-22  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-22  6:01 Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2023-05-22  9:24 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-22  9:55   ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-05-22 10:19     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-22 15:21       ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-22 15:37         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-23  3:45       ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-05-23 10:12         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-06-12 14:47           ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230522060137.225154-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).