patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: fix option block
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 10:02:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007100255.6cd33dcb@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314094626.1068059-1-mingjinx.ye@intel.com>

On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:46:26 +0000
Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com> wrote:

> The options allow (-a) and block (-b) cannot be used at the same time.
> Therefore, allow (-a) will not be added when block (-b) is present.
> 
> Fixes: b3ce7891ad38 ("test: fix probing in secondary process")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test/process.h | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/process.h b/app/test/process.h
> index 9fb2bf481c..388c7975cd 100644
> --- a/app/test/process.h
> +++ b/app/test/process.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ add_parameter_allow(char **argv, int max_capacity)
>  	int count = 0;
>  
>  	RTE_EAL_DEVARGS_FOREACH(NULL, devargs) {
> -		if (strlen(devargs->name) == 0)
> +		if (strlen(devargs->name) == 0 || devargs->type != RTE_DEVTYPE_ALLOWED)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (devargs->data == NULL || strlen(devargs->data) == 0) {
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ process_dup(const char *const argv[], int numargs, const char *env_value)
>  {
>  	int num = 0;
>  	char **argv_cpy;
> -	int allow_num;
> +	int allow_num, block_num;
>  	int argv_num;
>  	int i, status;
>  	char path[32];
> @@ -89,7 +89,18 @@ process_dup(const char *const argv[], int numargs, const char *env_value)
>  	if (pid < 0)
>  		return -1;
>  	else if (pid == 0) {
> -		allow_num = rte_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_ALLOWED);
> +		allow_num = 0;
> +		block_num = 0;
> +
> +		/* If block (-b) is present, allow (-a) is not added. */
> +		for (i = 0; i < numargs; i++) {
> +			if (strcmp(argv[i], "-b") == 0 ||
> +			    strcmp(argv[i], "-block") == 0)

The long form of the option is "--block" not "-block".

Why is a test infrastructure adding both options anyway, seems like that is the real problem.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-14  9:46 Mingjin Ye
2024-03-15  6:49 ` Jiale, SongX
2024-10-07 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-12  9:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Mingjin Ye
2024-10-12 22:20   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-14 10:22     ` Ye, MingjinX
2024-10-14 10:00   ` [PATCH v3] test: fix option devices Mingjin Ye
2024-10-15 16:21     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-16  8:17     ` [PATCH v4] " Mingjin Ye

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007100255.6cd33dcb@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).