From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
Cc: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
<stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] interrupts: fix number of bytes read for vdev
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:01:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008210107.7f41e36c@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007150403.1680983-1-skoteshwar@marvell.com>
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:33:59 +0530
<skoteshwar@marvell.com> wrote:
> From: Satha Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
>
> Correct the number of bytes to read during vdev interrupt processing.
> The driver sets this value, and the rxtx interrupt handling already
> performs this correctly.
>
> Fixes: 99998feec90 ("eal/linux: add interrupt type for vdev")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Satha Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
Not sure how this works.
The code in eal_handle_interrupts sits on a epoll_wait() waiting
for next interrupt.
eal_inter_process_interrupts() is called.
The switch you modified decides what needs to be read to clear the interrupt.
If you change RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VDEV to read bytes from the eventfd
by setting bytes_read then the code in this function will read the counter
value from the event fd immediately.
Then when eal_intr_proc_rxtx_intr() is called it will decide to read again.
And since the event is cleared, this read will get EWOULDBLOCK.
What exactly is the issue? How to reproduce it?
Also setting call = true in the switch is wrong.
The code later in eal_intr_process_interrupts that handles bytes_read > 0
already sets call = true if interrupt was cleared from eventfd.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 15:03 skoteshwar
2024-10-09 4:01 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241008210107.7f41e36c@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).