* [PATCH v4] net/gve: allocate RX QPL pages using malloc
[not found] <20250107190258.2107909-1-joshwash@google.com>
@ 2025-01-09 19:46 ` Joshua Washington
2025-01-09 20:05 ` Joshua Washington
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Washington @ 2025-01-09 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen de Borst, Rushil Gupta, Joshua Washington, Junfeng Guo,
Xiaoyun Li
Cc: dev, stable, Praveen Kaligineedi
From: Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>
Allocating QPL for an RX queue might fail if enough contiguous IOVA
memory cannot be allocated. This can commonly occur when using 2MB huge
pages because the 1024 4K buffers are allocated for each RX ring by
default, resulting in 4MB for each ring. However, the only requirement
for RX QPLs is that each 4K buffer be IOVA contiguous, not the entire
QPL. Therefore, malloc will be used to allocate RX QPLs instead.
Note that TX queues require the entire QPL to be IOVA contiguous, so it
will continue to use the memzone-based allocation.
v2: Updated RX path to use malloc exclusively
v3: Changed commit description to match updated code
v4: Add fixes tag to allow 2M hugepages to be used on older versions of
DPDK
Fixes: a46583cf43c8 ("net/gve: support Rx/Tx")
Cc: junfeng.guo@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>
---
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h | 5 +-
drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
index db4ebe7036..e471a34e61 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
@@ -22,42 +22,97 @@ gve_write_version(uint8_t *driver_version_register)
writeb('\n', driver_version_register);
}
+static const struct rte_memzone *
+gve_alloc_using_mz(const char *name, uint32_t num_pages)
+{
+ const struct rte_memzone *mz;
+ mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(name, num_pages * PAGE_SIZE,
+ rte_socket_id(),
+ RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (mz == NULL)
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc memzone %s.", name);
+ return mz;
+}
+
+static int
+gve_alloc_using_malloc(void **bufs, uint32_t num_entries)
+{
+ uint32_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
+ bufs[i] = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, rte_socket_id());
+ if (bufs[i] == NULL) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to malloc");
+ goto free_bufs;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+
+free_bufs:
+ while (i > 0)
+ rte_free(bufs[--i]);
+
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
static struct gve_queue_page_list *
-gve_alloc_queue_page_list(const char *name, uint32_t num_pages)
+gve_alloc_queue_page_list(const char *name, uint32_t num_pages, bool is_rx)
{
struct gve_queue_page_list *qpl;
const struct rte_memzone *mz;
- dma_addr_t page_bus;
uint32_t i;
qpl = rte_zmalloc("qpl struct", sizeof(struct gve_queue_page_list), 0);
if (!qpl)
return NULL;
- mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(name, num_pages * PAGE_SIZE,
- rte_socket_id(),
- RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG, PAGE_SIZE);
- if (mz == NULL) {
- PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc %s.", name);
- goto free_qpl_struct;
- }
qpl->page_buses = rte_zmalloc("qpl page buses",
num_pages * sizeof(dma_addr_t), 0);
if (qpl->page_buses == NULL) {
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc qpl page buses");
- goto free_qpl_memzone;
+ goto free_qpl_struct;
}
- page_bus = mz->iova;
- for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
- qpl->page_buses[i] = page_bus;
- page_bus += PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ if (is_rx) {
+ /* RX QPL need not be IOVA contiguous.
+ * Allocate 4K size buffers using malloc
+ */
+ qpl->qpl_bufs = rte_zmalloc("qpl bufs",
+ num_pages * sizeof(void *), 0);
+ if (qpl->qpl_bufs == NULL) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc qpl bufs");
+ goto free_qpl_page_buses;
+ }
+
+ if (gve_alloc_using_malloc(qpl->qpl_bufs, num_pages))
+ goto free_qpl_page_bufs;
+
+ /* Populate the IOVA addresses */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++)
+ qpl->page_buses[i] =
+ rte_malloc_virt2iova(qpl->qpl_bufs[i]);
+ } else {
+ /* TX QPL needs to be IOVA contiguous
+ * Allocate QPL using memzone
+ */
+ mz = gve_alloc_using_mz(name, num_pages);
+ if (!mz)
+ goto free_qpl_page_buses;
+
+ qpl->mz = mz;
+
+ /* Populate the IOVA addresses */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++)
+ qpl->page_buses[i] = mz->iova + i * PAGE_SIZE;
}
- qpl->mz = mz;
+
qpl->num_entries = num_pages;
return qpl;
-free_qpl_memzone:
- rte_memzone_free(qpl->mz);
+free_qpl_page_bufs:
+ rte_free(qpl->qpl_bufs);
+free_qpl_page_buses:
+ rte_free(qpl->page_buses);
free_qpl_struct:
rte_free(qpl);
return NULL;
@@ -69,7 +124,18 @@ gve_free_queue_page_list(struct gve_queue_page_list *qpl)
if (qpl->mz) {
rte_memzone_free(qpl->mz);
qpl->mz = NULL;
+ } else if (qpl->qpl_bufs) {
+ uint32_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < qpl->num_entries; i++)
+ rte_free(qpl->qpl_bufs[i]);
+ }
+
+ if (qpl->qpl_bufs) {
+ rte_free(qpl->qpl_bufs);
+ qpl->qpl_bufs = NULL;
}
+
if (qpl->page_buses) {
rte_free(qpl->page_buses);
qpl->page_buses = NULL;
@@ -89,7 +155,7 @@ gve_setup_queue_page_list(struct gve_priv *priv, uint16_t queue_id, bool is_rx,
/* Allocate a new QPL. */
snprintf(qpl_name, sizeof(qpl_name), "gve_%s_%s_qpl%d",
priv->pci_dev->device.name, queue_type_string, queue_id);
- qpl = gve_alloc_queue_page_list(qpl_name, num_pages);
+ qpl = gve_alloc_queue_page_list(qpl_name, num_pages, is_rx);
if (!qpl) {
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
"Failed to alloc %s qpl for queue %hu.",
diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h
index c417a0b31c..35cb9062b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h
@@ -62,7 +62,10 @@ struct gve_queue_page_list {
uint32_t id; /* unique id */
uint32_t num_entries;
dma_addr_t *page_buses; /* the dma addrs of the pages */
- const struct rte_memzone *mz;
+ union {
+ const struct rte_memzone *mz; /* memzone allocated for TX queue */
+ void **qpl_bufs; /* RX qpl-buffer list allocated using malloc*/
+ };
};
/* A TX desc ring entry */
diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c
index 1f5fa3f1da..7a91c31ad2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ gve_rx_mbuf(struct gve_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf *rxe, uint16_t len,
rxq->ctx.mbuf_tail = rxe;
}
if (rxq->is_gqi_qpl) {
- addr = (uint64_t)(rxq->qpl->mz->addr) + rx_id * PAGE_SIZE + padding;
+ addr = (uint64_t)rxq->qpl->qpl_bufs[rx_id] + padding;
rte_memcpy((void *)((size_t)rxe->buf_addr + rxe->data_off),
(void *)(size_t)addr, len);
}
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] net/gve: allocate RX QPL pages using malloc
2025-01-09 19:46 ` [PATCH v4] net/gve: allocate RX QPL pages using malloc Joshua Washington
@ 2025-01-09 20:05 ` Joshua Washington
2025-01-09 22:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Washington @ 2025-01-09 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen de Borst, Rushil Gupta, Joshua Washington, Xiaoyun Li
Cc: dev, stable, Praveen Kaligineedi
Hello,
I wish for this fix to be backported to stable release 22.11 and 23.11
for DPDK. However, the patch as it is does not apply cleanly to either
release. What is the recommended way to include this patch in older
releases of DPDK? Should I create separate stable backport patches
that apply cleanly to each of the stable releases? Or will this issue
be resolved once stable maintainers attempt to apply the patch on
older releases?
Thanks,
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] net/gve: allocate RX QPL pages using malloc
2025-01-09 20:05 ` Joshua Washington
@ 2025-01-09 22:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2025-01-09 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Washington
Cc: Jeroen de Borst, Rushil Gupta, Xiaoyun Li, dev, stable,
Praveen Kaligineedi
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:05:43 -0800
Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wish for this fix to be backported to stable release 22.11 and 23.11
> for DPDK. However, the patch as it is does not apply cleanly to either
> release. What is the recommended way to include this patch in older
> releases of DPDK? Should I create separate stable backport patches
> that apply cleanly to each of the stable releases? Or will this issue
> be resolved once stable maintainers attempt to apply the patch on
> older releases?
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
1. You must wait until it accepted in to main branch for an upcoming release.
2. Make sure it you add Fixes tag and Cc stable@dpdk.org
The stable maintainers pick it up from there.
3. If patch does not apply cleanly, they send out a "help with backporting" mail
before release with instructions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-09 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20250107190258.2107909-1-joshwash@google.com>
2025-01-09 19:46 ` [PATCH v4] net/gve: allocate RX QPL pages using malloc Joshua Washington
2025-01-09 20:05 ` Joshua Washington
2025-01-09 22:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).