From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE1446468 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:18:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3499C40BA5; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:18:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E9D40A71 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:18:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1742833108; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5Em8O79e1hcschFh4vY8f7xKjePg7ZCCGmilQ8m2MAQ=; b=G4eI2UtVhDnuLJ1rcEHBfzF40dI9EFFkM7srozntgSOibS50D61xXDZ/dBmZkPsGf84RaJ j5uz5DgaIjosbbQwWr38oDL2wL2cWvmY8slv9xZFwLqkfy++29LUqSoRwypyRCQz2P3/Rt C6qVMNGCHKHATe2rSXTLPKfYLEZrdMQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-258-Vjz-3bEkM1CSyzaTytzFRA-1; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:18:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Vjz-3bEkM1CSyzaTytzFRA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Vjz-3bEkM1CSyzaTytzFRA_1742833094 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D9C1955D99; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rh.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.32.16]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3B330001A1; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:18:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Traynor To: Maayan Kashani Cc: Dariusz Sosnowski , dpdk stable Subject: patch 'net/mlx5: fix non-template flow validation on create' has been queued to stable release 24.11.2 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:16:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20250324161731.63950-15-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250324161731.63950-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> References: <20250324161731.63950-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: oe6DiNzhxJVhd5EwfJgdjUV1B0DL3uqTZGN4yB619tU_1742833094 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 24.11.2 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 03/28/25. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable/commit/535cab510acc023f6a9bee4214396f0ac444987c Thanks. Kevin --- >From 535cab510acc023f6a9bee4214396f0ac444987c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maayan Kashani Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:34:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix non-template flow validation on create [ upstream commit f8ce702cd05f555ab8a52e6d827f096d80fbb825 ] Currently, a non template rule on top of HWS can be created successfully although validation fails. Added in flow creation, the rule validation, And deduce the items flags from the validation items loop. Fixes: 0989f6808401 ("net/mlx5: update NTA rule pattern and actions flags") Signed-off-by: Maayan Kashani Acked-by: Dariusz Sosnowski --- drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c | 98 ++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c index 95c13d6a11..8f3cb45daf 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c @@ -546,85 +546,4 @@ flow_hw_hashfields_set(struct mlx5_flow_rss_desc *rss_desc, } -/** - * Generate the matching pattern item flags. - * - * @param[in] items - * Pointer to the list of items. - * - * @return - * Matching item flags. RSS hash field function - * silently ignores the flags which are unsupported. - */ -static uint64_t -flow_hw_matching_item_flags_get(const struct rte_flow_item items[]) -{ - uint64_t item_flags = 0; - uint64_t last_item = 0; - - for (; items->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; items++) { - enum rte_flow_item_flex_tunnel_mode tunnel_mode = FLEX_TUNNEL_MODE_SINGLE; - int tunnel = !!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_TUNNEL); - int item_type = items->type; - - switch (item_type) { - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4: - last_item = tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3_IPV4 : - MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV4; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6: - last_item = tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3_IPV6 : - MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV6; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP: - last_item = tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4_TCP : - MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP: - last_item = tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4_UDP : - MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT: - last_item = tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_INNER_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT : - MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_OUTER_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GRE: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_GRE; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_NVGRE: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_GRE; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_VXLAN; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_VXLAN_GPE; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GENEVE: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_GENEVE; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MPLS: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_MPLS; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_GTP; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_COMPARE: - last_item = MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_COMPARE; - break; - case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_FLEX: - mlx5_flex_get_tunnel_mode(items, &tunnel_mode); - last_item = tunnel_mode == FLEX_TUNNEL_MODE_TUNNEL ? - MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_FLEX_TUNNEL : - tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_INNER_FLEX : - MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_OUTER_FLEX; - break; - default: - break; - } - item_flags |= last_item; - } - return item_flags; -} - static uint64_t flow_hw_action_flags_get(const struct rte_flow_action actions[], @@ -14043,5 +13962,5 @@ static uintptr_t flow_hw_list_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct rte_flow_action *qrss = NULL; const struct rte_flow_action *mark = NULL; - uint64_t item_flags = flow_hw_matching_item_flags_get(items); + uint64_t item_flags = 0; uint64_t action_flags = flow_hw_action_flags_get(actions, &qrss, &mark, &encap_idx, &actions_n, error); @@ -14054,9 +13973,16 @@ static uintptr_t flow_hw_list_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, }; struct rte_flow_error shadow_error = {0, }; + const struct rte_flow_pattern_template_attr pattern_template_attr = { + .relaxed_matching = 0, + .ingress = attr->ingress, + .egress = attr->egress, + .transfer = attr->transfer, + }; - /* - * TODO: add a call to flow_hw_validate function once it exist. - * and update mlx5_flow_hw_drv_ops accordingly. - */ + /* Validate application items only */ + ret = flow_hw_pattern_validate(dev, &pattern_template_attr, items, + &item_flags, error); + if (ret < 0) + return 0; RTE_SET_USED(encap_idx); -- 2.48.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2025-03-24 16:15:15.342125502 +0000 +++ 0015-net-mlx5-fix-non-template-flow-validation-on-create.patch 2025-03-24 16:15:14.769735578 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From f8ce702cd05f555ab8a52e6d827f096d80fbb825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 535cab510acc023f6a9bee4214396f0ac444987c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit f8ce702cd05f555ab8a52e6d827f096d80fbb825 ] + @@ -13 +14,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -22 +23 @@ -index 8d9c0d2813..c95261cd01 100644 +index 95c13d6a11..8f3cb45daf 100644 @@ -25 +26 @@ -@@ -590,85 +590,4 @@ flow_hw_hashfields_set(struct mlx5_flow_rss_desc *rss_desc, +@@ -546,85 +546,4 @@ flow_hw_hashfields_set(struct mlx5_flow_rss_desc *rss_desc, @@ -111 +112 @@ -@@ -14296,5 +14215,5 @@ static uintptr_t flow_hw_list_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, +@@ -14043,5 +13962,5 @@ static uintptr_t flow_hw_list_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, @@ -118 +119 @@ -@@ -14307,9 +14226,16 @@ static uintptr_t flow_hw_list_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, +@@ -14054,9 +13973,16 @@ static uintptr_t flow_hw_list_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,