From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F88246BAE for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B840E5A; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2D740611 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:38:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1752867504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=46IfFHdgIHVcWy8zEmlGA3hOEEIyleEaQE79x9eiqm0=; b=TNuGeTg2JF6NrpOJIpdjBMmEG9tnZuv/PCqgBH8SO4jvHyXTlyKjN12Jq0XTX6VIkE+uv5 PvX2atCAwGyLWNP5N00ZenOXpeP1QB1vnAYIkSGLr1zfm5jMEGbB7CkKKKdI7q+kxefcFh qlsUsXKl84NGSCgkEph2h1IQr/77fgI= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-277-z3_NLO_vOECuGBy9scG7Xw-1; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:38:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: z3_NLO_vOECuGBy9scG7Xw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: z3_NLO_vOECuGBy9scG7Xw_1752867502 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E330C1956048; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rh.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.32.40]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55ED18003FC; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Traynor To: Volodymyr Fialko Cc: dpdk stable Subject: patch 'examples/ipsec-secgw: fix number of queue pairs' has been queued to stable release 24.11.3 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 20:31:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20250718193247.1008129-159-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250718193247.1008129-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> References: <20250718193247.1008129-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: gFUvtagGyFUyY-1RSbcmzWMnZeUz18Ut6Jwv4jfpmmU_1752867502 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 24.11.3 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 07/23/25. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable/commit/1e9f40fa2f6d564bb832f8fc185450dde557c938 Thanks. Kevin --- >From 1e9f40fa2f6d564bb832f8fc185450dde557c938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volodymyr Fialko Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 10:23:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix number of queue pairs [ upstream commit 7e6d6106a4ef052d6a2a6bd6e83c5b16a36c65c9 ] Fix a mismatch between the signature of the cryptodevs_init() function and the arguments passed to it during the call. This caused incorrect initialization of queue pairs in ipsec-secgw example. Fixes: 253265f8fb97 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: reduce queues for event lookaside") Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Fialko --- examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c index 063cc8768e..fe489f9a56 100644 --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c @@ -2995,14 +2995,5 @@ main(int32_t argc, char **argv) sess_sz = max_session_size(); - /* - * In event mode request minimum number of crypto queues - * to be reserved equal to number of ports. - */ - if (eh_conf->mode == EH_PKT_TRANSFER_MODE_EVENT) - nb_crypto_qp = rte_eth_dev_count_avail(); - else - nb_crypto_qp = 0; - - nb_crypto_qp = cryptodevs_init(nb_crypto_qp); + nb_crypto_qp = cryptodevs_init(eh_conf->mode); if (nb_bufs_in_pool == 0) { -- 2.50.0 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2025-07-18 20:29:16.549622652 +0100 +++ 0159-examples-ipsec-secgw-fix-number-of-queue-pairs.patch 2025-07-18 20:29:11.156908023 +0100 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From 7e6d6106a4ef052d6a2a6bd6e83c5b16a36c65c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 1e9f40fa2f6d564bb832f8fc185450dde557c938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit 7e6d6106a4ef052d6a2a6bd6e83c5b16a36c65c9 ] + @@ -11 +12,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org