From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EC046BE8 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943324003C; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qv1-f48.google.com (mail-qv1-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CC04003C for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:42:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qv1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6faf66905adso34668656d6.2 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1753198950; x=1753803750; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nkjasW7kt7TvHWCljXwnYbll163oaa4RNUJklwUeq5k=; b=urZKqdls8MbcgddmBf+SNrktl6Ql84zrphWSwhHPv3E+aWsJJT1EYivPYrjW45USgl /ecboYAt/gwDKdcPcpw6qstsvNW/HzmcX9XJFURzfHLD0eWE82yPoRJRV0R/dJhTg0zZ KhxI7wbrX/SduPmAoqv2nlPx8yXufdFWXKH664bZM0kpyZemWMg81MXX4NfwojQJG11n NslbTaTR4bplE2ArywVzv6yR/I5KvUnb0utGt6uKcgbnlOCMr9IK8OdwXD4C+ry2ceBE hLTcW2f6Y01belp57AKzLYDElOzDSiXQKDBeVulVzBt4ptwSVaYNzw3STnustIsN65y2 eUqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753198950; x=1753803750; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nkjasW7kt7TvHWCljXwnYbll163oaa4RNUJklwUeq5k=; b=dGNmhXuzawvg3HJ0REjQbZ/GOrNsvSHpYdFCqC61XA5VDf5/UOJ/7uLkbEkrpBSjJL hury5bD1doXA8Ye61wQa1ZLfDY9CWmT+qZQ9ipDd+CcS5bMd+dwDMEXch7NdMEJNdt2u VqiO7NBWiDJVz0NnNb/Enf5OeVSkk5kSEkZIRIUuH7Nv5s9e09yZaTMHqNgp5tO6SEHc 0r/4gddYYO3zSUzsuITLAa50+nYXl9JReB3wKvYyWK30KbkA5Gy27wNX8SYSKvxcsCKY RJTjithfGMu1LoNC49NWFboY6W5KrECSh/inWxqklcEO9xLoUSduGKWTMK//vbefyCkz iOHA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVD3mV45BD/SJHHcmzY3rCGBNdSkXkeTk+9RG3LaRBVkinsDDAUGbaoBfn+tSjdYWK032GCKqg=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyv1QhoIj5UpbwF3/tgmq1bQDgsxSKdcFeml02++1g6/V0zvYYw 1xlWAAZ3gREgofPP3NI3iKnNAkYJO8XJcbglbQ0TobBgF9ILzc1mUrv7kAa4Xtk67Mc= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvi4bSOTwe5ZB7wfI89p83YFclVqnOMZHRSNEe2vC2ax87C9ZWouAMfytj3QWU oEOiNkVonCP3Flo67y6wBaUp4+swNv0pcBzgQMqPOGzXP2Fo9u7ufZ4Ec9DuscW5+kUXQ3daXVr 8BG3mnxa8X+YOECdSg+0Ov9mAdYdi10+tMHOx01gJZ6Nh/tKCWx/+nU+xqWotk74IUTJdgiTuOm fSFHSw7AxwXmcx48jMKda+ln/HmujRhf9XlxyTcOgiWVrle06Eoe1TPI/MjBaXim8LMWFIh6I7o DynygjDen2q5thf9aJn5DthGBNq0GZv0WhqvWT1EHJE8iQ9eTZIsi1Pz5RuTTeXCMj1y+0D2kyB ooH766ZRxeWOio35Mljm2Q9DY53hLkQAVJ/GL25xpjOu4wb5wuh3ofCqbfcjuSFuIR6vxE7c0DW 4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEIM3YWgAKqDI9Aqv+IUmXbj7qor2AbpRZSgKLys97O0u4tZZWFwNaMZllew8jlWSApIR/cEw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2e8a:b0:704:f94e:b5da with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-704f94eb9b7mr264942636d6.50.1753198950095; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-7051ba8ea91sm53523306d6.80.2025.07.22.08.42.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:42:25 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , dev@dpdk.org, dpdk stable Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Message-ID: <20250722084225.7a40e2bc@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20250722115439.1353573-1-14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> <20250722063924.2f87f3f7@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 19:30:41 +0500 Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > Can we add only the check that fixes the segfault, or do you mean that it > should be fixed at the PMD level? > > Best regards, > Khadem > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 18:39 Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:54:39 -0400 > > Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> wrote: > > > > > + if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY && > > > + (dev == NULL || dev->data == NULL || > > > + dev->data->dev_private == NULL || > > > > dev can't be NULL and checking it here will cause a Coverity warning. > > > > There are many other ethdev calls that will fail if primary dies. > > stats, xstats, rx/tx burst, ... > > > > I don't think it is good idea to add checks here. > > It needs to be fixed at the documentation level. Make sure and document what applications need to do. Rather than adding more checks in ethdev.