From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0855F46C4D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:12:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029FA4025E; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:12:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam04on2047.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.100.47]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CF54025E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:12:09 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=d6i2T/4N/HahDg5oPbofxK0//BXIfw6M0tOnQ8kF8GzYmbULIl4mh2yFyNiLycSLxO4Yqas/8hYuIModsYvuFiNX1mo1XOsRJbQ9+IJU0Jzg+ZyNfbLOoGosDLeBpV2tqtzIgtGTOdwHIq72lAEd08xJ0Ekyxp7/y0jGBRCvtHTnwKBdKKA0D74gYN92miaJhIA68WvTdpv1yualQpiqkdbPvHY9uGl4w2KUNh4KSYcGWH8uudEw5wEeODnLRheccBLVHgdfbyzbbN1uG8u1Ic0pehRN3CdOfyRCnrHQsHfvfv0YC8ceDfETcQAK3LtDIzcAjY7k8uiTA1ippSxkbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=FQ/SNaodbak/jPaVR7TdU8woXMAMg877hziW7Dg+Cts=; b=buCaeA7b9ZIzmlUIvY1d7XRJ2jqeVMV3S+lWEry7JcDPOA5MhDZ1qRt8A5ZGwY2QWBYDP59pgN0ppcJ91ZgUCIkPDqDFsi4arYbsKdoLfE7lAMU9mWUa5Hytd4eGgSkbSiMqtaIVZJAgGFgQ6AmE4zVGt6me3iAp+sRmcdVSSU7bMx82uqrVhwZwotIE+qEa4I+PYIMoKMuTAKFVz14q3/cMLIW2xx8iJoNChKuv0iFyWD4HhKb0AkUDyWDHHwzZM7RB91AVjOQPOfmBrR6yR4Mu2wZ+uPr5bZbAVNQsgTlHjwhINlUb/fBsR9YnRuVWS85GzKJEVM13Q+mNaPa6kA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.161) smtp.rcpttodomain=marvell.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=FQ/SNaodbak/jPaVR7TdU8woXMAMg877hziW7Dg+Cts=; b=fTlfuhdRzzhVjyVl0MvoFay0BTmaXXImU2OZK14cBA0QvD7ZCjqL30MLPq3CrrZxGNm6Ljiy42lY0do2H7ztLjmOGum4xwMuZm4k51VvBSQfTFjdzSSgMceTryNESokn+K95a5xJ7o679u5Jkj9vc/uvHIWuJJ7Q2xwt2LdMh4xruN2H8lPuewnD1nnOHdsSgetzlkR4lsM9fAKcyI45FqHTEUiYY3eMwIYG7s5lw6aivMSo1gDSeck5iacLwoZ7FG9UOZ8lFX3vmmrOxXAU/1iQXDShlZlSS13+Is670kZdryjkCBq3WPPltrWOFEGiBjr7zO/KfjtN0jlekK8ptQ== Received: from MW4P221CA0002.NAMP221.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:303:8b::7) by DM6PR12MB4218.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:21b::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8989.11; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:12:05 +0000 Received: from CY4PEPF0000EE3D.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8b:cafe::59) by MW4P221CA0002.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:8b::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8989.11 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:12:05 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.161) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.161 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.161; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.161) by CY4PEPF0000EE3D.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8989.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:12:04 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.14; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:11:45 -0700 Received: from nvidia.com (10.126.231.35) by rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.14; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:11:40 -0700 From: Xueming Li To: Rakesh Kudurumalla CC: Xueming Li , dpdk stable Subject: patch 'examples/ipsec-secgw: fix crash with IPv6' has been queued to stable release 23.11.5 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 15:10:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20250730071045.136672-9-xuemingl@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20250730071045.136672-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> References: <20250626120145.27369-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <20250730071045.136672-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.126.231.35] X-ClientProxiedBy: rnnvmail202.nvidia.com (10.129.68.7) To rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CY4PEPF0000EE3D:EE_|DM6PR12MB4218:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 4ce812fb-3a3e-4195-5f40-08ddcf386372 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; ARA:13230040|36860700013|1800799024|376014|82310400026|7053199007|13003099007; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: =?us-ascii?Q?0EBaqNopV1p0xrM1M4AWQVvVVqQ1+HY2d7RTlk3YZhFP7AUO490LNGWc9cSF?= =?us-ascii?Q?B8uHM4kzdAKdoPRzcBy7crXtH/rgAbv6aqUA1b7gTP6PpIdkirCmCHSVV+so?= =?us-ascii?Q?vXlcq4F95Di1G8q2r3Dvfiqp3ihZSJ1pIDY2nJAGFizINMJ8rudtBDTptvVT?= =?us-ascii?Q?G/fmzWLbAgCzmz76LJhP9R6y68byPqvKV0VjIIEs5vRzWvTK/erci0kB53Pr?= =?us-ascii?Q?wsUC0wPC/q3HaOkKs9EFFto7sJ3aAdiGjzP1MZ+LwVxeJiDqd26/aGsn0ugB?= =?us-ascii?Q?0LudRo0pzibkZKcef8xlxjFJ9VILA80HqS4Xypymfh1ir8eFX/4uHMBXPv3x?= =?us-ascii?Q?KWTW3QYNuY5igtmxaVQ9UtDvSI59MNPfADBwlCrsv0ZdlnKPE0RlWq9b1nqp?= =?us-ascii?Q?XxJcieb6hr2BuCj+a3ZSNEni/acKKgwMrFdG3sxjw/YqLHcaN2nDJeoD2Ue4?= =?us-ascii?Q?NOpwZvLnrNioCrwipu7WXmissxFfIUwpigki9iswLGMUjhsbMCnMiTIoqzsb?= =?us-ascii?Q?OUpVvvIiQWsVXDfFXgkcAPA4o+0sCV8myOLJys0PMl47LkLleYuKzyQTFrG7?= =?us-ascii?Q?W8LBPzMFqFQAjApazGLVRiWjzNwOj8xKSYFhxSQSyKrfJnsnJD3HbIxFjpYU?= =?us-ascii?Q?nUMvcmJ/LzNR0mBnTzvrCmG/5B89fIdt4sRBXVRMuZJX7m2Bv/eGp+iFFsCx?= =?us-ascii?Q?mEc2cxDm6a9kBntB4cCj6aZXK88iUybfbFUrW0Hly6wF05eGAeNcCOZ4VCbi?= =?us-ascii?Q?xz7lB1TuTZhkBdohhvRV6WyJpLYlrJioZDU7Ttd57pR0qtoU+FWetK2MWGXN?= =?us-ascii?Q?KvgHJF9fAHsWrM1bmT62xAoVYzXvxj9aJUVN3Pk9K6joHx+YUtyNizJtgWoA?= =?us-ascii?Q?nMnF7g1EmiwmeTWsXzofKEoufmr6G/skjK7+U4zNVz2wq2/EWwVy2nDQI8cW?= =?us-ascii?Q?z+Eoegdq39f1WIunD39wPq06ZZF2re3GeFWGsoWJJr9kJ4+L/c+iCDx5StF0?= =?us-ascii?Q?VP61OIn/d3JOGi96+ZHMfcm0vd02INGD7ntO/xs5byeMsvB8snJvOidm/4bH?= =?us-ascii?Q?SRAuTkUK3yhy5Ji12rpOhq8QhLl151fI1NXmsxfij+tLFpeI60ujBmTnb1AJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?7lqys77ebLK6yNRMczPXeEqkDkO2vzhbgrEqGG4LkCMv3/1ISoUbsoiJaBnb?= =?us-ascii?Q?cAM0JxrpJysqqvSa9bxd7c+1ZnfEvaBf9QayNqzUeA34RbRwT83NgmRuygfa?= =?us-ascii?Q?aVYX7lByDCnx3UrtnZ9WBArwSUJhgJa/uxVhhFtf9IeV5FcXFx0Kq7u02XO0?= =?us-ascii?Q?V3H4gQd97YcO7R9vDwk3PpfqYwOH5q71H2QGY+U24Qi7XDF8t76uPdyB+LDB?= =?us-ascii?Q?kVnd42/ptQyld8zdDMKMNtTQGAg/DZXBjnPAFPG44rciewJCJ80YUHHlIVwm?= =?us-ascii?Q?rMXo/dxGwUd7Y8BNLN2wT3A6FVWFiFck+tbSRXVit1nVG8oFRUXnhNstRSt8?= =?us-ascii?Q?DvuCJ+/jbUnB/RbYsjXNSKsvADJ4Y9yrWOZ1?= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.161; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:dc6edge2.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230040)(36860700013)(1800799024)(376014)(82310400026)(7053199007)(13003099007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2025 07:12:04.8898 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4ce812fb-3a3e-4195-5f40-08ddcf386372 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.117.161]; Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY4PEPF0000EE3D.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR12MB4218 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 23.11.5 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 08/10/25. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/log/?h=23.11-staging This queued commit can be viewed at: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=23.11-staging&id=e00f818f69338496e90f518ff6af83433e4e6484 Thanks. Xueming Li --- >From e00f818f69338496e90f518ff6af83433e4e6484 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rakesh Kudurumalla Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:33:00 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix crash with IPv6 Cc: Xueming Li [ upstream commit d03869e8e9c7c46bf7637d221ca6921516764109 ] While running ipsec-secgw application if IPv6 rules are not configured in IPsec configuration, LPM look up fails and destination port is updated as BAD_PORT. During process_packet ethernet_hdr is updated resulting in crash due to out of bound. This patch fixes the same. Fixes: 6eb3ba03995c ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support poll mode NEON LPM lookup") Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla --- examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h index 8b93b4b52e..fc04000336 100644 --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec_neon.h @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ processx4_step3(struct rte_mbuf *pkts[FWDSTEP], uint16_t dst_port[FWDSTEP], uint32x4_t ve[FWDSTEP]; uint32_t *p[FWDSTEP]; struct rte_mbuf *pkt; + uint16_t port; uint32_t val; uint8_t i; @@ -34,7 +35,8 @@ processx4_step3(struct rte_mbuf *pkts[FWDSTEP], uint16_t dst_port[FWDSTEP], *l_pkt |= 1; p[i] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, uint32_t *); - ve[i] = vreinterpretq_u32_s32(val_eth[dst_port[i]]); + port = (dst_port[i] == BAD_PORT) ? 0 : dst_port[i]; + ve[i] = vreinterpretq_u32_s32(val_eth[port]); te[i] = vld1q_u32(p[i]); /* Update last 4 bytes */ @@ -76,6 +78,7 @@ process_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, uint16_t *dst_port, uint64_t tx_offloads, { struct rte_ether_hdr *eth_hdr; uint32x4_t te, ve; + uint16_t port; uint32_t val; /* Check if it is a large packet */ @@ -85,7 +88,8 @@ process_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, uint16_t *dst_port, uint64_t tx_offloads, eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, struct rte_ether_hdr *); te = vld1q_u32((uint32_t *)eth_hdr); - ve = vreinterpretq_u32_s32(val_eth[dst_port[0]]); + port = (dst_port[0] == BAD_PORT) ? 0 : dst_port[0]; + ve = vreinterpretq_u32_s32(val_eth[port]); val = vgetq_lane_u32(te, 3); #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN -- 2.34.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2025-07-30 15:02:13.069972929 +0800 +++ 0008-examples-ipsec-secgw-fix-crash-with-IPv6.patch 2025-07-30 15:02:12.774913471 +0800 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From d03869e8e9c7c46bf7637d221ca6921516764109 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From e00f818f69338496e90f518ff6af83433e4e6484 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -4,0 +5,3 @@ +Cc: Xueming Li + +[ upstream commit d03869e8e9c7c46bf7637d221ca6921516764109 ] @@ -13 +15,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org