From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059A2A0C3F
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:13:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57B34068A;
	Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:13:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com
 [209.85.221.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F0C4068A
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id d11so20398749wrm.0
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 02:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to
 :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=GlSg8WGYDB48Z9WyWZ8k7qY3NA2YX0MliIU19Lf9htA=;
 b=eENhghRyqtDy9P2LlU8ZadRUYtdoA7W1FeA/RRIJTYhqbzURyHKfV7Iyi4QLfTOpzv
 Xgp4lPRTWXSRg1cK/AzYJe4HMeCCZ3XO1p8UWhATS0oTNZXwjBNBAyimFEde3BJa8e7U
 bBSFfN19Sr3QHxKaAM9nnYrotNpymwe2EEqS/y48GfHCCeEqTPqAMwFxCpeRBhn8VJ5U
 Z+md/C6XkOCgP5OzfC/gB1OJIworuRbkg9T16i7N8vtWpCOqNEc2Sk9DymqpGZhlFfkh
 2gx6eIjO1QJCNuBEjP+G+IITYJkbUV77oDz9S0TvViP5wkgYD1gwEo5HclaWYQ3ceRix
 tI4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319QMqZPibXFWgUpBf4G7hXM8vVhkLlVPIH7gQgU1atTuBgDshG
 kvMHzB7tv32xX5lMuIT6PKg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJyj8fbm815RQDdZJrHkvrKIh33cQdcL5XYA0DuV0wKGvSDOpqOtRg0zeUcxX+XBqmxyUDzA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6945:: with SMTP id r5mr26319503wrw.249.1624871584260; 
 Mon, 28 Jun 2021 02:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([137.220.125.106])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16sm14280106wrp.51.2021.06.28.02.13.03
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 28 Jun 2021 02:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <205f243e1ed6df6d5b17817e6af4a91f0705fb56.camel@debian.org>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>, dpdk stable
 <stable@dpdk.org>, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>, Akhil Goyal
 <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:13:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0+LKEsm=ucC9y3W4JEmrEDO=-VzxtZneBsjjvF8mTC=ng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAATJJ0+LKEsm=ucC9y3W4JEmrEDO=-VzxtZneBsjjvF8mTC=ng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] Why was "drivers/crypto: fix build with
 -fno-common" not picked for 19.11 stable back then?
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 09:34 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> there is an old patch [1] which back then was not considered/taken
> into 19.11 series.
> This is now breaking Clang build [2].
>=20
> Since you were the Author/Maintainers back then I wanted to ask if
> there was a reason to not pick it? If it should be picked now and if
> there are any special things to consider for a backport?
>=20
> Chiming in/subscribing to the bug would also be appreciated.
>=20
> [1]: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/eef9e0412a84cddf8944379ed4995314=
b4369370
> [2]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D733#c6

Can't remember the details about this particular one, but I think
several fixes were backported for the -fno-common issue in 19.11

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi