From: Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o@gmail.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
Yasufumi Ogawa <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:19:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25f8c508-606e-6ede-8c8d-b8948af90e3b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c3fba36-9cb2-76ad-198f-c11a63f01a9a@intel.com>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 11:31 AM
>>> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; Yasufumi Ogawa
>>> <yasufum.o@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; dev
>>> <dev@dpdk.org>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Yasufumi Ogawa
>>> <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in
>>> secondary
>>>
>>> On 05-Nov-19 10:13 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>>>> Hello Anatoly, Yasufumi,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:20 AM Burakov, Anatoly
>>>> <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01-Nov-19 9:04 AM, yasufum.o@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> From: Yasufumi Ogawa <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays
>>>>>> with its
>>>>>> PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it
>>>>>> does not work if several secondaries run as app containers because
>>>>>> each
>>>>>> of containerized secondary has PID 1, and failed to reserve unique
>>>>>> name
>>>>>> other than first one. To reserve unique name in each of
>>>>>> containers, use
>>>>>> hostname in addition to PID.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> We can't backport this as is, see below.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_fbarray.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_fbarray.h
>>>>>> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_fbarray.h
>>>>>> index 6dccdbec9..5c2815093 100644
>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_fbarray.h
>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_fbarray.h
>>>>>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ extern "C" {
>>>>>> #include <rte_compat.h>
>>>>>> #include <rte_rwlock.h>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -#define RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN 64
>>>>>> +#define RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN NAME_MAX
>>>>
>>>> The change on RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN breaks the ABI, so we cannot
>>>> backport this as is.
>>>> For 19.11, we can allow this breakage, but we need an update of the
>>>> release notes.
OK. I wasn't careful for the ABI change. I think RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN 64
is enough without using hostname as a part of fbarray. So I would like
to discard this change.
>>>>
>>>> Besides, what is the impact in terms of memory consumption?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct rte_fbarray {
>>>>>> char name[RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN]; /**< name associated with
>>>>>> an array */
>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
>>>>>> b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
>>>>>> index af6d0d023..24f0275c9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
>>>>>> @@ -1365,6 +1365,7 @@ secondary_msl_create_walk(const struct
>>>>>> rte_memseg_list *msl,
>>>>>> struct rte_memseg_list *primary_msl, *local_msl;
>>>>>> char name[PATH_MAX];
>>>>>> int msl_idx, ret;
>>>>>> + char hostname[HOST_NAME_MAX] = { 0 };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (msl->external)
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> @@ -1373,9 +1374,13 @@ secondary_msl_create_walk(const struct
>>>>>> rte_memseg_list *msl,
>>>>>> primary_msl = &mcfg->memsegs[msl_idx];
>>>>>> local_msl = &local_memsegs[msl_idx];
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - /* create distinct fbarrays for each secondary */
>>>>>> - snprintf(name, RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN, "%s_%i",
>>>>>> - primary_msl->memseg_arr.name, getpid());
>>>>>> + /* Create distinct fbarrays for each secondary by using PID and
>>>>>> + * hostname. The reason why using hostname is because PID
>>>>>> could be
>>>>>> + * duplicated among secondaries if it is launched in a
>>>>>> container.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> + gethostname(hostname, HOST_NAME_MAX);
>>>>
>>>> Personal preference, s/HOST_NAME_MAX/sizeof(hostname)/.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hostname[] is HOST_NAME_MAX bytes long.
>>>> In the worst case, we can get a non NULL terminated hostname string.
>>>> "
>>>> gethostname() returns the null-terminated hostname in the
>>>> character array name, which has a length of len bytes. If the
>>>> null-terminated hostname is too large to fit, then the name is
>>>> truncated, and
>>>> no error is returned (but see NOTES below). POSIX.1-2001 says
>>>> that if such truncation occurs, then it is unspecified whether the
>>>> returned buffer includes a terminating null byte.
>>>> ...
>>>> NOTES
>>>> SUSv2 guarantees that "Host names are limited to 255 bytes".
>>>> POSIX.1-2001 guarantees that "Host names (not including the
>>>> terminating null byte) are limited to HOST_NAME_MAX bytes". On
>>>> Linux,
>>>> HOST_NAME_MAX is defined with the value 64, which has been the
>>>> limit since Linux 1.0 (earlier kernels imposed a limit of 8 bytes).
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> How about making hostname[] HOST_NAME_MAX+1 bytes long?
>>>>
>>>>>> + snprintf(name, RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN, "%s_%s_%d",
>>>>>> + primary_msl->memseg_arr.name, hostname,
>>>>>> (int)getpid());
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ret = rte_fbarray_init(&local_msl->memseg_arr, name,
>>>>>> primary_msl->memseg_arr.len,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the order should be reversed. Both containers and
>>>>> non-containers
>>>>> can have their hostname set, and RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN is of fairly
>>>>> limited length, so if the hostname is long enough, the PID never gets
>>>>> into the name string, resulting in duplicates. It is better have
>>>>> pid first.
>>>>
>>>> Anatoly,
>>>>
>>>> On the principle, it seems better, yes.
>>>> Just the comment on RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN indicates that you missed the
>>>> change at the top of the patch.
>>>> What do you think of this change?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, i did miss that, apologies.
>>>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion on this change, however the above comment
>>> would still be true if we make fbarray size to be hostname_max + 1 - we
>>> still potentially get no space for a pid. So if we're going to have pid
>>> in there as well, it should be hostname_max + pid_max (5 digits?) +
>>> whatever underscores we have + null terminator, to ensure it fits under
>>> any and all circumstances.#
In "man 5 proc", it says the default value of pid_max is 32768, but can
be set up to 2^22 (=4194304) on 64-bit systems. So, I think it is safer
to consider pid_max is 7 digits.
I can find secondary's fbarray file named as
$ sudo ls /var/run/dpdk/rte/
...
fbarray_memseg-1048576k-0-0_24118
fbarray_memseg-1048576k-0-0_24191
fbarray_memseg-1048576k-0-0_24199
...
It consists of [prefix]-[hugepage size]-[numa node?]-[memchan?]_[PID]",
and size of the name before PID is totally 28 digits. If another
underscore and hostname are included in the name, the max size of
fbarray file name is
28 + 7(PID) + 1(underscore) + HOST_NAME_MAX+1(null terminator)
Considering 28 can be larger, how about using 32 as following?
+ int fbarray_sec_name_len = 32 + 7 + 1 + HOST_NAME_MAX + 1;
+ snprintf(name, fbarray_sec_name_len, "%s_%d_%s",
+ primary_msl->memseg_arr.name, getpid(), hostname);
>>
>> I think that at least on linux we have more than enough space here:
>>
>> $ find /usr/include -type f | xargs grep ' NAME_MAX' | grep define
>> /usr/include/linux/limits.h:#define NAME_MAX 255 /* #
>> chars in a file name */
>>
>> $ find /usr/include -type f | xargs grep ' HOST_NAME_MAX' | grep define
>> /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/bits/local_lim.h:#define
>> HOST_NAME_MAX 64
>> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/local_lim.h:#define
>> HOST_NAME_MAX 64
>>
>
> Okay, works for me :)
Thanks,
Yasufumi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 1:59 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary ogawa.yasufumi
2019-04-16 3:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 0/1] Get " ogawa.yasufumi
2019-04-16 3:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/1] fbarray: get " ogawa.yasufumi
2019-07-04 20:17 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-05 8:53 ` [dpdk-stable] " Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-09 10:22 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-09 10:24 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-09 10:26 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-11 9:37 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-11 9:43 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-11 10:31 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-11 10:31 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-11 10:53 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-11 11:57 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-11 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-12 2:22 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-22 1:06 ` Ogawa Yasufumi
2019-07-22 9:33 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-22 9:25 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-24 8:20 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-24 8:20 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-24 9:59 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-30 8:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-30 9:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-31 5:48 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-11 9:36 ` David Marchand
2019-10-25 15:36 ` David Marchand
2019-10-25 19:54 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-26 16:15 ` David Marchand
2019-10-26 18:11 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-28 8:07 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 0/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary yasufum.o
2019-10-28 8:07 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-10-29 12:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-30 13:42 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-30 19:00 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-31 10:03 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-31 10:32 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-01 9:04 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-01 9:04 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-01 12:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-04 10:20 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-05 10:13 ` David Marchand
2019-11-05 11:31 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-05 11:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-06 10:37 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-08 3:19 ` Yasufumi Ogawa [this message]
2019-11-13 21:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v7 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-13 21:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v7 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-14 10:01 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 11:42 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-11-14 12:27 ` David Marchand
2019-11-26 19:40 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-11-27 10:26 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 12:55 ` David Marchand
2019-11-14 17:32 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2023-06-13 16:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25f8c508-606e-6ede-8c8d-b8948af90e3b@gmail.com \
--to=yasufum.o@gmail.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).