From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077D1A0525 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:37:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D777C2C23; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:37:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D0FFFA; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:36:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F3321391; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 04:36:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 04:36:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=trhAYryVttjqcWdv/mC2nFZ0wv/a7kp32lKfKEL8RwY=; b=adah/tfIbzZ7 /vpxefcGmlAy2gz016cAmSKF+bvc9IRtA4dklGYEW8arehWD9xkj9Bg//HkKSi1Q hgQlaynmYrvLPhrXpFONPUnnTt4Uh1umps6n0kL1aNQeetDJSPOIyTOilFcoutlh XD0Ts6j5QMRzL8Jtt+td2wU5TgddcxA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=trhAYryVttjqcWdv/mC2nFZ0wv/a7kp32lKfKEL8R wY=; b=uSUqTMI7zmFYoHTymANljDe1k9HuEDIh++wepUI2hqmV+w7jymjmxSEiM 2BGuqN9FJIsJCZnkYO4hFG/g0fPJUWyJqKVJr12lvnt2ohb0UjeQ6Tt9BuGARZKh kK5Rdsxt/FuJwylI4HKvMYfLI1ZowGH5GNF3BIUatGcI/njyMEck0zPCa2py6e9L zARzzr0jNn30ztY4+IhLdzP/jBcOR2MYGkyqwohMlw9QChiFvFelBgaHBSeCYOpE rgItHHT5RwZNUnHheLq+nIZrxr8aIcESBm+0UjfgugTnX52jdcw0GMgLA2sMwwAk jFXcgYlL59jDI2kVFqojx44i/wF0g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehgddtgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E7A1D8005A; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 04:36:55 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Xiaoyun Li Cc: jingjing.wu@intel.com, omkar.maslekar@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:36:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3368887.qqrk5fENW1@xps> In-Reply-To: <20191225090942.20202-1-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> References: <20191225090942.20202-1-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] examples/ntb: fix mempool ops setting issue X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 25/12/2019 10:09, Xiaoyun Li: > Mempool ops may register in different order when compiling. The default > ops index is always zero but the wanted ops is ring_mp_mc. This patch > sets best mempool ops before generating mbuf pool to fix this issue. > > Fixes: 5194299d6ef5 ("examples/ntb: support more functions") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li Not sure I understand the explanation, but Applied