From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CA3A09D2 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:49:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC239493D; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:49:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646CA2AB; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:49:00 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: wGHrrrgB6YxtNF15kfiYrFrKG4ePUI5qDQQGiq+UKgvVqce3OGsFyk/6Q8xlWX9q682yP4haEd QEKFzplGcEOA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="157125892" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,469,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="157125892" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2020 00:48:49 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 9651AMnACZg10EvpkTtnquksJo2qWhiOTHkAsuU/AgOklHoW7+d4YMRERNrAAYQT8uvWP7cPY1 ju3j72qAFaUQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,469,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="530152380" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2020 00:48:47 -0800 Received: from shsmsx603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:48:45 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:48:43 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:48:43 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Xu, Ting" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Xing, Beilei" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v1] net/iavf: fix RSS queue region size exceeds Thread-Index: AQHWt/YqUW4MHmPDEkuJnbClghuKiqnCnt1Q Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:48:43 +0000 Message-ID: <3a6b223cda614a5386cd19a4b0f9f62e@intel.com> References: <20201111064250.13660-1-ting.xu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201111064250.13660-1-ting.xu@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1] net/iavf: fix RSS queue region size exceeds X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" > -----Original Message----- > From: Xu, Ting > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 2:43 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z ; Xing, Beilei ; > Wu, Jingjing ; stable@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v1] net/iavf: fix RSS queue region size exceeds >=20 > When a rule is set to do RSS to redirect flows to a group of queues, the = queue > region size should not be larger than the max RSS queue region supported = by > HW. This patch added the step to check the queue region size, and report > failure if the size does not meet the requirement. >=20 > Fixes: e436cd43835b ("net/iavf: negotiate large VF and request more queue= s") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ting Xu Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi