From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900BCA0524 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:30:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BFFC93C; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:30:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25A6C93C; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:30:22 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: UEDjggN5r+5TuvUlVAN8jRSRRP2jnI01rCmqd5o2DvNvNi7zHVbHnwuIGY7nM/AkaTz8KsWcsa xDTSuvPY7Akg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9816"; a="169701271" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,371,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="169701271" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Nov 2020 01:30:15 -0800 IronPort-SDR: fZ1QYa5fkbRI81LrTkNIhLXq8zx9qB62wU08VYtOroFHcfAE69O+jknDe+C9XFQ+if/m66bCzL xF3zsIMTak3w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,371,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="343882040" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2020 01:30:13 -0800 Received: from shsmsx602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:30:11 -0800 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) by SHSMSX602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:30:10 +0800 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.216]) by SHSMSX606.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.216]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:30:10 +0800 From: "Ling, WeiX" To: "Zhang, AlvinX" , "Liang, Cunming" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, AlvinX" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix buffer overflow Thread-Index: AQHWww/4Bvd7dZtg+UKHezxJcgT/E6naJykQ Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:30:10 +0000 Message-ID: <401ff25dd41d47c0a4ae2b9492e55b09@intel.com> References: <20201125094622.12064-1-alvinx.zhang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201125094622.12064-1-alvinx.zhang@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix buffer overflow X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Tested-by: Wei Ling Regards, Ling Wei > -----Original Message----- > From: dev On Behalf Of Zhang,Alvin > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 05:46 PM > To: Liang, Cunming > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, AlvinX ; > stable@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix buffer overflow >=20