From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F21FA04F1 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:21:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CF61D559; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:21:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179C01D545; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1CC5C0049; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:21:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 May 2020 17:21:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= NJzFtFRgudd1GUkldmU8SL0gEeie+F72pQKK08xiljo=; b=XxYMg3qQIsDR0yQJ 1mJUgegVZfIuaFejVB2L2HvJQpxmj2zhYcP6CEatEJJtrNHS8f7WKbB0qncWp3JP vsCBD5XAkrxPcKdIBDSI4lJPbQ0V0DRmcV5eiWn3AQm/TDBjExAH9gzXAp4WFgVP vC7LUts6UmpU6IAUI0CB9uEDrlUrR3n0y6gU9sV9gWFFaWRynYF7ad3ZY+JbjUqR +rb7FSA381o4dplTMqC5sb3ewiBF57FQXQU26vaeMVo+yxqpKSpWVvl56Q/b61pe TkNkKg61gWgr3O/9wsvZ7fEBW0OGQ7up5+wV0+jSJJA+VnR5j18xzRJ/BZRYi0S+ xPkOIA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=NJzFtFRgudd1GUkldmU8SL0gEeie+F72pQKK08xil jo=; b=GbO8aNgtDSS2VPhZVTWXjVWaX2MbTn3GXG9tMU62+mjvwUhXga0TNdyEr /6K47mZXaKWZpcbRQux+WkpRVpdfbH+9rC06drt8x1Uh4sU57j/6y2EFomnnn7VA 3C8g1RvmMtiV6alkYjG8M/x75wwR7OG3SNwR0Wl16I8RqHSf9NT74URQE+plbeeS hGCUNwOE9LGdneB96KWF88S6k4bWKJe4quTeubRXML8H6mMTXiJGjT0T+tBoJS+K +Qhxx9bQVHi+H8Y61pu8nQtyR7M8jL3ablYZynGhMr5sDxJBxtIDaKfe4VO5OmtE n1Qa4DlBWgws/VN5UhMdJIN5JwXlw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddukedgudehkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejvdetgfdvteffheeuvddvveektdehjeeuuddtvddujeevteeu ffegffeifedtvdenucffohhmrghinhephhhurghrmhdrtghomhenucfkphepjeejrddufe egrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 15A13328005D; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:21:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Phil Yang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, jerinj@marvell.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, joyce.kong@arm.com, nd@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:21:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4358338.8uJDUzQGum@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1573468461-25972-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> References: <1573468461-25972-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <1573468461-25972-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: add aarch32 build guidance X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 11/11/2019 11:34, Phil Yang: > Add a guidance for aarch64 natively build 32-bit aarch32 DPDK. > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > Tested-by: Joyce Kong > > --- > .../linux_gsg/cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst | 36 ++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) What is the status of this patch? The patch 1/2 was rejected. There are new works around aarch32. Is it still relevant?