From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1DB7CB0;
 Thu,  7 Mar 2019 16:36:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACC2373D;
 Thu,  7 Mar 2019 10:36:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Mar 2019 10:36:10 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=OMY5RhCr10Ov2AQ277+/PXpwKaFaVX6WdZG/Fy5CLmM=; b=AFNlQi3ybIlc
 sDGWdkDFGZncbA1O4+a6Ihp2POGMUuroBu0VQjEFYrCqzr+PZD6/STXJv+Usfxu0
 5cmI0hMbyk8K/zt+A14BLtH7V2ta8z9n6GwmhrvSTGv0yFvC3U2GKtca2qMLNdzN
 /tAfwR1qyc6hYpbwobmrttD0VHyI1To=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OMY5RhCr10Ov2AQ277+/PXpwKaFaVX6WdZG/Fy5CL
 mM=; b=HKq5K/ZudAAHR8ivsXVW+NjMgDcs02kgnP57v2UuWSWUB+s9hjuP121zI
 uElbCvkFa0ya3PcQiGtI8eEEbhi9fMH3XWErOKP9Z6N0s0Btzt8AJ4+ZP4tOwsgP
 f16hy3fsep6FA9Ojqoj4nNWms9lmwvumfhnxJxXmdEAkFZ995LOn3VnNRKA9u7xP
 03RU14Q7F0vyvMBrR024M1fwCcGOnh/cqShcxAOECp5Xtb0o+xWr3o6QXwE9Q5qF
 vdu5ltBOJPchrs0yHM7KDV4AiNkRTwFOFqLLhl5SGFtv4TI7q7Wv8diVJaIf3F++
 JBpTyB8kxmKeedZkpii1KZNk1boIA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:aDqBXDjpbL2kl0-oNM15SAHef3p3H93XzByEuatFCG3Ldgt5YXxiCQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrfeekgdektdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs
 ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph
 epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho
 mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:aDqBXLfqHV_GG9v_OIfL1-LVY1-5oKQWxJiiF2gx8q0EAo3K1WsuwQ>
 <xmx:aDqBXGltPPuwFlO88D5AfFuijyNDL1mG5c18wTVcMX5Ilbr26O4-9A>
 <xmx:aDqBXEvS_0hv2dj_lZ3sAoZiFd7C2BDqoCReghqu5VOX47vKgv-bRA>
 <xmx:aTqBXElDzlOMUl0LQWzGEk_3iPWH7ikSYepMfaEiLQwbX7MdxENZcg>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 43752E465F;
 Thu,  7 Mar 2019 10:36:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
 dev@dpdk.org
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:36:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4580955.3nGxzKOxPX@xps>
In-Reply-To: <dcc597f5-0195-01f1-a581-7601beb09c6d@intel.com>
References: <1550150874-9535-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <1550608693-12882-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <dcc597f5-0195-01f1-a581-7601beb09c6d@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] eal: fix check when retrieving current
	cpu affinity
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:36:11 -0000

20/02/2019 17:02, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 19-Feb-19 8:38 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > pthread_getaffinity_np returns a >0 value when failing.
> > 
> > This is mainly for the sake of correctness.
> > The only case where it could fail is when passing an incorrect cpuset
> > size wrt to the kernel.
> > 
> > Fixes: 2eba8d21f3c9 ("eal: restrict cores auto detection")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

Applied, thanks