From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505FD4298A for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2171F40A79; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D24A4021F for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:21:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1681914069; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AUl8kFOOx8mrX51Ya/tNJEIP0PGNA2NKsedUcQ0HvWs=; b=hUxIkiDCxfFXeBnGbD9jvOyJwytPZbXkVSLmDtxKyt6HC43nXhz8quTvaKzJb3wJb0qyUY MqYK7khOHJACOKiLx9Ff1rJKs4lLYh8E+arkgR0RvqYa2pxDGj8dle71Z3kOg7bk4yDL6q yse0SRJqtpu+cCwOVm+XDiN+/Vy1Suc= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-6-hqkHHwE9MBC7y4c4gs9QKQ-1; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 10:21:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hqkHHwE9MBC7y4c4gs9QKQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f1745d08b5so9832935e9.1 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:21:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681914067; x=1684506067; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AUl8kFOOx8mrX51Ya/tNJEIP0PGNA2NKsedUcQ0HvWs=; b=QI3JLtkJQPH32UQeanKg/Q5Hn0+GUCUDhuel+CBgzGJwzVm7SrbqarSnXEl7XISc4R 6oOef3Hz49CDgvUf6em/9zfe8tRXOiPeGhKN5NbQcuK3YY+o1G64Cy2KeOG6j7JTY2k0 a5RlioRjLiRrQlQ2Zx9HOsmj7mji9qM2ZqWEbeMTalSE2qR8U3q24VFFdIipsqr5fv5M E6Oms27oOZlk5j+fjxxyw/9IvHspZ+6Zr9jMc0fY/rfnX6DpZpuQE6m530SAGg91x03f pR+WqI9OvsS6NBAiuXci70fG8Ul7xm/LpbYvPnCAT9rwokS8FsJdnMuwU1ushhq9x9jp p4CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9ccOm4inmfBeBm0ZY2btBtAQa6ALaWG5aM0lrxizyKXDvHWdXi4 beXDDruw9NXrpGpul7YHvqDCz1ES/WvE6aDQfeKfaOtBbYl5TFfWT0b2SiLNXKx4t2FY5zeurRL Oed9Q/kc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:144:b0:2cf:efc7:19ad with SMTP id r4-20020a056000014400b002cfefc719admr5348537wrx.53.1681914067083; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:21:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YSeT7VBkQNo/gvHVb07HzN9kT2feknbQLvuPPIpqCsFlI9SP8sLQ8dsHMzdIRSHEHpIJFYfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:144:b0:2cf:efc7:19ad with SMTP id r4-20020a056000014400b002cfefc719admr5348524wrx.53.1681914066816; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.36] ([78.19.110.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w23-20020a05600c099700b003f17af4c4e0sm2382287wmp.9.2023.04.19.07.21.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55ce3c58-8236-b99a-3fa2-313ed111afcb@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:21:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 To: YangHang Liu , "Xu, HailinX" Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" References: <20230406113734.261672-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> From: Kevin Traynor Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On 19/04/2023 12:00, YangHang Liu wrote: > Hi, Kevin > > RedHat QE does not find new issues about the v21.11.4-rc1 dpdk during the > tests. > Hi YangHang, thanks for testing and the report. Kevin. > We tested below 18 scenarios and all got PASS on RHEL9: > > - Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): > PASS > - Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) > : PASS > - Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS > - PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS > - PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS > - PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS > - Guest with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS > - vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server qemu reconnect: PASS > - vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server ovs reconnect: PASS > - PVP reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: PASS > - PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS > - PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS > - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS > - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS > - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS > - Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 4Q live migration testing: PASS > - Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS > - Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS > > Test Versions: > > - qemu-kvm-6.2.0 > - kernel 5.14 > - dpdk 21.11.4-rc1 > > git log -1 > > commit f7dce59377b34750fdda7d1780d527233c84663f > > Author: Kevin Traynor > > Date: Thu Apr 6 09:11:25 2023 +0100 > > version: 21.11.4-rc1 > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor > > > - Test device : X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G) > > Best Regards, > YangHang Liu > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 2:13 PM Xu, HailinX wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kevin Traynor >>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM >>> To: stable@dpdk.org >>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; >>> Ali Alnubani ; Walker, Benjamin >>> ; David Christensen ; >>> Hemant Agrawal ; Stokes, Ian >>> ; Jerin Jacob ; Mcnamara, John >>> ; Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Kevin >>> Traynor ; Luca Boccassi ; Pei >>> Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q ; Raslan >>> Darawsheh ; Thomas Monjalon >>> ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. >>> >>> The planned date for the final release is 25th April. >>> >>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any >>> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the >> fixes and >>> reported validations will be added to the release notes. >>> >>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: >>> >>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 >>> >>> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Kevin >> >> HI All, >> >> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 validation >> test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. >> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >> 1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: >> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet >> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under >> investigating >> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest >> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, >> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package >> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible >> Descriptor, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF >> single core performance test, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test >> - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >> - On going. >> >> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as >> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf >> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >> - All test done. found bug1. >> * Cryptodev: >> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API >> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. >> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput >> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> >> Regards, >> Xu, Hailin >> >> >