From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0379A0535 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:57:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93F51BE90; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:57:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD70D137D; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:57:02 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2020 06:56:54 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,433,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="222308101" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2020 06:56:54 -0800 Received: from lcsmsx601.ger.corp.intel.com (10.109.210.10) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:56:54 -0800 Received: from lcsmsx603.ger.corp.intel.com (10.109.210.12) by LCSMSX601.ger.corp.intel.com (10.109.210.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:56:51 +0200 Received: from lcsmsx603.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.109.210.12]) by LCSMSX603.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.109.210.12]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:56:51 +0200 From: "Trybula, ArturX" To: Akhil Goyal CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" , "Trahe, Fiona" , "shallyv@marvell.com" , "Dybkowski, AdamX" , "Danilewicz, MarcinX" , Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/compress: replace test vector Thread-Index: AQHV3NMSnRRWCE5DykyyN77ZHVtEBagXdIAAgAAB14CAAAtwgIAALSOw Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:56:51 +0000 Message-ID: <5ba26c3e81294de7aeb8e03131d8f57c@intel.com> References: <20200114115656.14611-1-arturx.trybula@intel.com> <20200206093735.27604-1-arturx.trybula@intel.com> <5794052.17fYzF0512@xps> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNjcyN2JhZDYtMmVlMC00OTU1LTg4ZWUtZjk0NmYxNDMyMWE2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiVzJ1OWI4MktXbElDZDZmUnZpRTh5aXBvbmQ0SXY4MU9nNjZUT1ZLRU9lb2sxa0d0WnhzZWd1c0UwNlZFSCtSeCJ9 dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-originating-ip: [163.33.253.164] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/compress: replace test vector X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi Akhil, > Hi Artur, > > >=20 > > 12/02/2020 14:25, Akhil Goyal: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > > > > This patch replaces an existing test vector with a new one=20 > > > > containing public domain text only. This is to avoid any potential= =20 > > > > issues re-licensing content as BSD-3 which has no clear original li= cense. > > > > > > > > Fixes: b06aa643cac4 ("test/compress: add initial unit tests") > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Artur Trybula > > > > --- > > > > v2 changes: > > > > - changed test vector (the 3rd entry), text from > > > > Alice's Adventures in Wonderland instead of C-code (v1) > > > > - added BSD SPDX header > > > > > > > > app/test/test_compressdev_test_buffer.h | 194=20 > > > > ++++++++++++------------ > > > > 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Do you have any more comments on this patch? > >=20 > > No more comment. > >=20 > > Should we also tag stable for this patch? Yes, we need this tag.